IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/clnure/v22y2013i2p206-227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Qualitative Identification of Categories of Patient Participation in Decision-Making by Health Care Professionals and Patients During Surgical Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Liv-Helen Heggland
  • Kjell Hausken

Abstract

The aim of this article is to identify how health care professionals and patients experience patient participation in decision-making processes in hospitals. Eighteen semi-structured interviews with experts from different disciplines such as medicine and nursing in surgical departments as well as patients who have undergone surgical treatment constitute the data. By content analysis four categories of patient participation were identified: information dissemination, formulation of options, integration of information, and control. To meet the increasing demands of patient participation, this categorization with four identified critical areas for participation in decision-making has important implications in guiding information support for patients prior to surgery and during hospitalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Liv-Helen Heggland & Kjell Hausken, 2013. "A Qualitative Identification of Categories of Patient Participation in Decision-Making by Health Care Professionals and Patients During Surgical Treatment," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 22(2), pages 206-227, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:22:y:2013:i:2:p:206-227
    DOI: 10.1177/1054773812464043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1054773812464043
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1054773812464043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaston, Christine M. & Mitchell, Geoffrey, 2005. "Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(10), pages 2252-2264, November.
    2. Entwistle, Vikki & Williams, Brian & Skea, Zoe & MacLennan, Graeme & Bhattacharya, Siladitya, 2006. "Which surgical decisions should patients participate in and how? Reflections on women's recollections of discussions about variants of hysterectomy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 499-509, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liv‐Helen Heggland & Kjell Hausken, 2014. "Patient participation, decision‐makers and information flow in surgical treatment," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(9-10), pages 1430-1444, May.
    2. Holly O. Witteman & Laura D. Scherer & Teresa Gavaruzzi & Arwen H. Pieterse & Andrea Fuhrel-Forbis & Selma Chipenda Dansokho & Nicole Exe & Valerie C. Kahn & Deb Feldman-Stewart & Nananda F. Col & Ale, 2016. "Design Features of Explicit Values Clarification Methods," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 36(4), pages 453-471, May.
    3. Mendick, Nicola & Young, Bridget & Holcombe, Christopher & Salmon, Peter, 2010. "The ethics of responsibility and ownership in decision-making about treatment for breast cancer: Triangulation of consultation with patient and surgeon perspectives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 1904-1911, June.
    4. Zandra Engelbak Nielsen & Connie Bøttcher Berthelsen, 2019. "Cancer patients’ perceptions of factors influencing their decisions on participation in clinical drug trials: A qualitative meta‐synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2443-2461, July.
    5. Bugge, Carol & Entwistle, Vikki A. & Watt, Ian S., 2006. "The significance for decision-making of information that is not exchanged by patients and health professionals during consultations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 2065-2078, October.
    6. Hamblin, Richard & Minko, Nikolai & Shuker, Carl & Hill, Jennifer & Merry, Alan F., 2018. "What happens at the end of life? Using linked administrative health data to understand healthcare usage in the last year of life in New Zealand," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(7), pages 783-790.
    7. Liv-Helen Heggland & Torvald Øgaard & Aslaug Mikkelsen & Kjell Hausken, 2012. "Patient Participation in Surgical Treatment Decision Making from the Patients' Perspective: Validation of an Instrument," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-8, July.
    8. Entwistle, Vikki & Prior, Maria & Skea, Zoe C. & Francis, Jillian J., 2008. "Involvement in treatment decision-making: Its meaning to people with diabetes and implications for conceptualisation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 362-375, January.
    9. shuster, stef m., 2019. "Performing informed consent in transgender medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 190-197.
    10. Klein, Jens & von dem Knesebeck, Olaf, 2015. "Socioeconomic inequalities in prostate cancer survival: A review of the evidence and explanatory factors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 9-18.
    11. Rebecca Jaks & Elena Guggiari & Saskia Maria De Gani & Dunja Nicca, 2023. "Patients’ Perspectives on the Use of a Newly Developed “Patients’ Guide for Doctor’s Visit”: DocVISITguide," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:clnure:v:22:y:2013:i:2:p:206-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.