IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v58y2022i3p300-316.html

Agriculture in Communist China: Progress without Structural Reforms

Author

Listed:
  • Binh Giang Nguyen

Abstract

This article examines the Communist Party of China’s (CPC) policies toward agriculture from an institutional perspective. Mao Zedong viewed the peasantry as allies of the CPC, and in order to socialise rural areas, he ordered massive collectivisation, attempting to manage the countryside and peasants with people’s communes and production brigades. Deng Xiaoping and Jiang Zemin responded to the dysfunction that followed with reforms and opening up, including the abolition of collectives and people’s communes, liberalising agriculture, and promoting incentives for labour. This led to its own complications, and efforts later by Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping have been directed towards resolving the ‘three rural issues’ – of agriculture, rural areas, and farmers – in order to achieve a ‘moderately prosperous society’ and the ‘great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation’. This article argues that while there is an emphasis on innovative policies and approaches, there is a lack of structural reforms owing to the CPC’s wish to remain in control of rural areas and peasant life.

Suggested Citation

  • Binh Giang Nguyen, 2022. "Agriculture in Communist China: Progress without Structural Reforms," China Report, , vol. 58(3), pages 300-316, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:58:y:2022:i:3:p:300-316
    DOI: 10.1177/00094455221108232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00094455221108232
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00094455221108232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiacheng Zhang & Jianli Luo & Jia Li, 2021. "Agricultural co-operatives participating in supply chain integration in China: A qualitative comparative analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Molela Godfrey Frank, 2025. "Upgrading the Tanzanian Agricultural Commodity Exchange Market under the Warehouse Receipt System: A Review of Forward Market Linkages in Sunflower Agribusiness," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, Sciendo, vol. 77(3), pages 317-325.
    2. Daria Maciejewska & Dawid Olewnicki & Ksenia Juszczak-Szelągowska & Dagmara Stangierska-Mazurkiewicz, 2026. "Prospective Industries: An Assessment of the Performance and Competitiveness of Vineyards in Central Poland," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 75-90.
    3. Setyardi Pratika Mulya & Delik Hudalah, 2026. "Urbanization pressure and farmers’ attitudes: implications for agricultural sustainability," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 5127-5160, February.
    4. Mulya, Setyardi Pratika & Pravitasari, Andrea Emma & Putra, Andi Syah & Rosandi, Vely Brian & Wulandari, Siti & Wahid, Muhammad & Wihana, Dadang & Fahrizal, Mohammad, 2026. "Integrating SWOT-QCA for determining subregion strategy in the economic sector," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Jia Shi & Jiacheng Zhang & Naiyan Xie & Zhuodong Yang & Jianli Luo, 2022. "An Agricultural Supply Chain Coordination Model: The Case of Trinity Comprehensive Cooperation Organization in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Mahuwi, Leticia & Israel, Baraka, . "Supply Chain Issues Affecting Market Access Among Smallholder Maize Farmers in Mbozi District, Tanzania," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 11(2).
    7. Utomo, Raden Priyo & Kuleh, Yohanes & Darma, Dio Caisar, 2023. "Conventional vs modern: which approach is better for the success of agricultural cooperatives?," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:58:y:2022:i:3:p:300-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.