IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ausman/v45y2020i3p527-545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surfacing the social factors early: A sociotechnical approach to the design of a future submarine

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Amy Boeing
  • Karina Jorristma
  • Mark A Griffin
  • Sharon K Parker

Abstract

Socially oriented approaches to work systems design are increasingly important as new and disruptive technologies become more prevalent. Existing approaches used by organisations to integrate such technologies are often techno-centric and do not adequately consider human issues. Sociotechnical systems (STS) tools are intended to ensure that the technical and organisational aspects of a system are considered together, and given equal attention. However, they are predominately applied late in the design process, limiting their impact. In this article, we outline an STS approach to the early-phase development of a complex work system. The case study illuminates how an STS approach can facilitate the inclusion of socially oriented factors into the design process. We close with recommendations to guide the early-phase application of STS principles in other industries and contexts. JEL Classification: C93, D02

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Amy Boeing & Karina Jorristma & Mark A Griffin & Sharon K Parker, 2020. "Surfacing the social factors early: A sociotechnical approach to the design of a future submarine," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(3), pages 527-545, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:45:y:2020:i:3:p:527-545
    DOI: 10.1177/0312896220920338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0312896220920338
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0312896220920338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ezekiel Chinyio & Akintola Akintoye, 2008. "Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: findings from the UK," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 591-599.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Titov Sergei & Trachuk Arkady & Linder Natalya & RD Pathak & Danny Samson & Zafar Husain & S Sushil, 2023. "Digital transformation enablers in high-tech and low-tech companies: A comparative analysis," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(4), pages 801-843, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silas Nkundumpaye & Jean De Dieu Dushimimana, 2022. "Project Management Practices And Performance Of Agricultural Cooperatives. The Case Of Cotumu Cooperative In Gakenke District, Rwanda," Working papers 2022-42-07, Voice of Research.
    2. Kristijan Robert Prebanić & Mladen Vukomanović, 2021. "Realizing the Need for Digital Transformation of Stakeholder Management: A Systematic Review in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Qiuchen Wang & Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge & Sebastiaan Meijer, 2019. "Adopting an Actor Analysis Framework to a Complex Technology Innovation Project: A Case Study of an Electric Road System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-35, December.
    4. George Nwangwu, 2019. "Stakeholder Opposition Risk in Public-Private Partnerships," International Journal of Economics and Financial Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(2), pages 36-42, 02-2019.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Future complex work systems; human systems integration; sociotechnical systems; socially oriented design;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:45:y:2020:i:3:p:527-545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agsm.edu.au .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.