IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Europe and the General Strategy

Listed author(s):
  • Constantin ANGHELACHE

    („Artifex” University of Bucharest / Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest)

  • Valentin BICHIR

    (Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest)


    (Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest)

  • Bogdan DRAGOMIR

More than five decades after World War ii and two decades since the end of the cold War and its corresponding threat of nuclear annihilation, existential security concerns seem far from the minds of average Europeans. This sense of safety, combined with tight government budgets in a time of economic crisis, makes costly weapons systems and other defense expenditures seem less essential to citizens and policymakers alike. But despite the impression of security, europe cannot afford to be complacent to continued threats in a still-dangerous world. While the cold War danger of global nuclear war has receded, the risk of missile-borne nuclear attack remains. At the 2010 NATO Summit in Lisbon, Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) was designated a core element of NATO’s collective defense requirements and the Alliance committed “to expand NATO’s current system to protect NATO-deployed forces to also protect NATO European populations and territory.” And at the 2012 NATO Summit in Chicago, the Alliance confirmed its strategic and financial commitment. NATO defense and intelligence communities consider the ongoing ballistic missile and nuclear weapons development efforts of regional actors such as North Korea to be legitimate security threats. Many NATO and European Union officials are concerned that the ongoing economic crisis may deter European nations from fulfilling their basic obligation to protect their people and territories from nuclear attack.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Romanian Statistical Review in its journal Romanian Statistical Review Supplement.

Volume (Year): 61 (2013)
Issue (Month): 2 (May)
Pages: 196-199

in new window

Handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:61:y:2013:i:2:p:196-199
Contact details of provider: Postal:
16 Libertatii Avenue, Sector 5, Bucureşti, Code 70542

Phone: 004 021 336 2691
Fax: 004 021 3124873
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:61:y:2013:i:2:p:196-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Adrian Visoiu)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.