IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/rampas/v2012y2012i18p6-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development Of An Evaluation Tool For Participative E-Government Services: A Case Study Of Electronic Participatory Budgeting Projects In Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp NITZSCHE

    () (Chair of Information and Communication Management, University of Administrative Sciences Speyer, Germany)

  • Adriano PISTOIA

    () (Information and Communication Management; University of Administrative Sciences Speyer, Germany)

  • Marc ELSÄßER

    () (Information and Communication Management; University of Administrative Sciences Speyer, Germany)

Abstract

In recent years, web 2.0 increasingly gained importance in terms of e-government. In this context, e-participation received more and more attention. However, there are only few examinations providing a structured overview on web 2.0 implementation possibilities in participative e-government. This contribution examines these implementation possibilities using electronic Participative Budgeting projects. The web 2.0 characteristics “interaction orientation”, “personalization”,” social networking”, and “user added value” serve as evaluation criterions. The examination shows that web 2.o implementation in German projects is still at a very low maturity level. In parts, communities have significant implementation significances concerning provided features and integration of citizens. Using the most advanced approaches we illustrate how the targeted use of web 2.0 tools can influence the Participative Budgeting success.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp NITZSCHE & Adriano PISTOIA & Marc ELSÄßER, 2012. "Development Of An Evaluation Tool For Participative E-Government Services: A Case Study Of Electronic Participatory Budgeting Projects In Germany," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2012(18), pages 6-25, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2012:y:2012:i:18:p:6-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ramp.ase.ro/en/_data/files/articole/2012/18-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    E-government; electronic Participatory Budgeting (ePB) projects; web 2.0 characteristics; evaluation framework.;

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • L53 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Enterprise Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2012:y:2012:i:18:p:6-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Androniceanu Armenia). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.