IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The Oreste’s Method in the Multicriteria’s Decision Process for the Management of Tourism Field

Listed author(s):
  • Octavia GIVESCU


    (Romanian Banking Institute, Romania)

During the decision process, one has to take into consideration more than one criterion, the alternative that meets as many criteria as possible being chosen eventually. As it is impossible to reach the maximum level that is wished for separately for each criterion at the same time, one has to settle for the alternative that is the best compromise considering all the criteria. In the field of tourism, developing any strategy regarding the tourist product, entering a market, organizing distribution and advertising means are based on a series of decisions and the use of modern methods of the decision theory has become a necessity for the managers in the respective business area. Among the methods that aim at choosing the alternative that meets as many criteria as possible, the “Oreste method” produces the order of the decision alternatives function of the significance/ value that they have within each criterion.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania in its journal Economia. Management.

Volume (Year): 10 (2007)
Issue (Month): 1 (July)
Pages: 37-51

in new window

Handle: RePEc:rom:econmn:v:10:y:2007:i:1:p:37-51
Contact details of provider: Postal:

Phone: 0040-01-2112650
Fax: 0040-01-3129549
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:econmn:v:10:y:2007:i:1:p:37-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.