IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/spower/sp1785.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative Development In The Context Of Contradictions In Positions Of Power, Business And Society
[Инновационное Развитие В Условиях Противоречий В Позициях Власти, Бизнеса И Общества]

Author

Listed:
  • Levkina, Anastasia (Левкина, Анастасия)

    (Tyumen State University)

Abstract

The article analyzes the topical problems of modern innovative development, conditioned by conceptual contradictions in the positions of power, business and society in contemporary culture. The author points out some basic mechanisms of modern organization of a society which give birth to these contradictions. The author makes a conclusion about the necessity to broaden the format of cooperation and self-management in which a society becomes a subject of its innovative development. To do it, it is necessary to implement social innovations contributing to distributed network format of self-organizing business management and aiming at realizing innovative development of a humane society.

Suggested Citation

  • Levkina, Anastasia (Левкина, Анастасия), 2017. "Innovative Development In The Context Of Contradictions In Positions Of Power, Business And Society [Инновационное Развитие В Условиях Противоречий В Позициях Власти, Бизнеса И Общества]," Sotsium i vlast / Society and power, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, pages 38-46.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:spower:sp1785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/spower/sp1785.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stiglitz, J E, 1979. "Equilibrium in Product Markets with Imperfect Information," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(2), pages 339-345, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arbatskaya, Maria & Konishi, Hideo, 2012. "Referrals in search markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 89-101.
    2. Rhodes, Andrew, 2011. "Multiproduct pricing and the Diamond Paradox," MPRA Paper 32511, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Rhodes, Andrew & Watanabe, Makoto & Zhou, Jidong, 2017. "Multiproduct Intermediaries and Optimal Product Range," MPRA Paper 82136, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Liudmyla Zhurakhovska, 2021. "Automation of the compliance matrix «Discipline – Competence» (by example of the educational masters program «Financial Intermediation»)," Technology audit and production reserves, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 4(4(60)), pages 15-18.
    5. Gonzalo Nunez-Chaim & Henry G. Overman & Capucine Riom, 2024. "Does subsidising business advice improve firm performance? Evidence from a large RCT," CEP Discussion Papers dp1977, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    6. Laurence Ball & David Romer, 1990. "Real Rigidities and the Non-Neutrality of Money," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 57(2), pages 183-203.
    7. Calestous Juma, 1985. "Market Restructuring and Technology Acquisition: Power Alcohol in Kenya and Zimbabwe," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 16(1), pages 39-59, January.
    8. Kimolo, Deogratius, 2018. "Price adjustment behaviour of manufacturing and service sector firms in Tanzania: a survey evidence of price stickiness," MPRA Paper 114941, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Alessandro Morselli, 2021. "Rationality, Information Power and Institutional Theory," Review of Economics and Institutions, Università di Perugia, vol. 12(2).
    10. Myers, Robert J. & Oehmke, James F., 1987. "Instability and Risk as Rationales for Government Intervention in Agriculture," Staff Paper Series 200938, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    11. S. Samusenko A. & С. Самусенко А., 2018. "Концепция информационной асимметрии как теоретическое обоснование феномена публичной нефинансовой отчетности // The Concept of Information Asymmetry as a Theoretical Substantiation of the Phenomenon o," Учет. Анализ. Аудит // Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, ФГОБУВО "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 5(3), pages 6-15.
    12. Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2017. "Monopolistic competition, the Dixit–Stiglitz model, and economic analysis," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(4), pages 798-802.
    13. Simon P. Anderson & Régis Renault, 2006. "Advertising Content," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(1), pages 93-113, March.
    14. Choudhary, M. Ali & Faheem, Abdul & Hanif, M. Nadim & Naeem, Saima & Pasha, Farooq, 2016. "Price setting & price stickiness: A developing economy perspective," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 44-61.
    15. Andrew Rhodes & Makoto Watanabe & Jidong Zhou, 2021. "Multiproduct Intermediaries," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(2), pages 421-464.
    16. Mimra, Wanda & Wambach, Achim, 2016. "A note on uniqueness in game-theoretic foundations of the reactive equilibrium," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 39-43.
    17. Ewerhart, Christian & Li, Sheng, 2023. "Imposing Choice on the Uninformed: The Case of Dynamic Currency Conversion," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    18. Bouakez, Hafedh, 2005. "Nominal rigidity, desired markup variations, and real exchange rate persistence," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 49-74, May.
    19. M. Ali Choudhary, 2005. "Pricing In The Customer‐Market Model With Uncertainty," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 73(2), pages 246-265, March.
    20. Nikogosian, Vigen & Veith, Tobias, 2011. "Strategic pricing, market entry and competition: Evidence from German electricity submarkets," ZEW Discussion Papers 11-068, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:spower:sp1785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.