IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/s21162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motives and Strategies of the Largest Investors: Influence on Corporate Governance
[Мотивы И Стратегии Мажоритарных Инвесторов: Влияние На Корпоративное Управление]

Author

Listed:
  • Kokoreva, Maria (Кокорева, Мария)

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Stepanova, Anastasia (Степанова, Анастасия)

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • Gaifeev, Bulat (Гайфеев, Булат)

    (National Research University Higher School of Economics)

Abstract

Concentration of corporate ownership has increased worldwide during recent years, especially in the holdings of the largest investors. The paper examines this trend in order to understand how changes in the stakes of the largest shareholders affect corporate governance and performance. In order to take into account the different goals and motives among institutional investors, the effects on corporate governance and performance attributable to the largest ownership stakes by traditional investment managers and by hedge funds are studied separately. A sample of non-financial companies from the Russell 3000 index indicates that the influence of the largest shareholders on corporate governance and performance depends on shareholders’ motives and strategies. The authors employ regression analysis of panel data to construct an index of the quality of corporate governance, which then shows that traditional investment managers prefer to invest in companies that already have superior corporate governance and that these investors bring about further improvements in governance, which also benefit performance. The influence of hedge funds as the largest owners is the opposite. Hedge funds with large holdings tend to degrade corporate governance and have no effect on performance. This paper concludes that the different motives of large investors in a company become quite significant as ownership becomes increasingly concentrated.

Suggested Citation

  • Kokoreva, Maria (Кокорева, Мария) & Stepanova, Anastasia (Степанова, Анастасия) & Gaifeev, Bulat (Гайфеев, Булат), 2022. "Motives and Strategies of the Largest Investors: Influence on Corporate Governance [Мотивы И Стратегии Мажоритарных Инвесторов: Влияние На Корпоративное Управление]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 68-89, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:s21162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/s21162.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bravo-Urquiza, Francisco & Moreno-Ureba, Elena, 2021. "Does compliance with corporate governance codes help to mitigate financial distress?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shoukat Ali & Ramiz ur Rehman & Wang Yuan & Muhammad Ishfaq Ahmad & Rizwan Ali, 2022. "Does foreign institutional ownership mediate the nexus between board diversity and the risk of financial distress? A case of an emerging economy of China," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(3), pages 553-581, September.
    2. Jorge Antunes & Peter Wanke & Thiago Fonseca & Yong Tan, 2023. "Do ESG Risk Scores Influence Financial Distress? Evidence from a Dynamic NDEA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-32, May.
    3. Cemil Kuzey & Habiba Al-Shaer & Ali Uyar & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2024. "Do board monitoring and audit committee quality help risky firms reduce CSR controversies?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1007-1045, October.
    4. Zhang, Yingrui & Li, Zehan & Dai, Hui & Fu, Liling, 2024. "Professional characteristics of board secretaries and litigation risks," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. Xing, Kai & Yang, Fang & Liu, Ping & Wang, Jue & Wu, Junchuan, 2025. "Environmental violations and financial distress risk: Evidence from Chinese listed heavily polluting companies," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    6. Jie Sun & Mengru Zhao & Cong Lei, 2024. "Class-imbalanced dynamic financial distress prediction based on random forest from the perspective of concept drift," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 1-44, December.
    7. Lv, Wendai & Meng, Qiuchi & Cao, Yuanyuan & Liu, Jiajia, 2025. "Impact and moderating mechanism of corporate tax avoidance on firm value from the perspective of corporate governance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Noha Adel Mohamed Abdelkader & Hayam Hassan Wahba, 2024. "A proposed multidimensional model for predicting financial distress: an empirical study on Egyptian listed firms," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:s21162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.