Author
Abstract
Introduction. The relevance of evaluating the effectiveness of vocational education institutions and their graduates in the labor market stems from the need to enhance the quality of specialist training, align their skills with market demands, improve graduate employment rates, and advance the vocational education system as a whole. Materials and methods. The materials used in the study included regulatory and legal documents, statistical data, and scientific publications in peer-reviewed journals on the assessment of educational effectiveness, graduate employment, and the development of professional skills. Results. The study characterizes cyclical imbalances in the labor market and identifies additional methods and tools for influencing the professional self-determination of prospective students to dynamically align their career choices with the needs of the national economy while harmonizing the interests of all market participants. The following cyclical labor market imbalances have been identified in the study: a) in the labor supply structure, graduates of secondary and higher vocational institutions predominantly specialize in law and economics, contrary to economic demands; b) in the labor demand structure, engineering professionals, social sector personnel (doctors and teachers), and IT specialists dominate, which only partially corresponds to the professional composition of graduates from educational institutions. Conclusion. The practical recommendations given in the study can be implemented by federal and regional executive authorities in the Russian Federation for improving the regulation of demand for vocational education. The proposals may also be utilized in further theoretical development concerning the regulation of labor markets and vocational education.
Suggested Citation
Anna K. Kaydashova, 2024.
"On the assessment of the effectiveness of vocational education institutions and their graduates in the labor market,"
Economic Consultant, Scientific and Educational Initiative LLC, issue 4, pages 70-84, December.
Handle:
RePEc:ris:statec:021469
DOI: 10.46224/ecoc.2024.4.6
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:statec:021469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roman I. Ostapenko (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.