IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/integr/0382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Numerical General Equilibrium Model with Endogenous Formation of Trading Blocs

Author

Listed:
  • Fisher, Timothy C.G.

    (University of Sydney)

  • Waschik, Robert G.

    (La Trobe University)

Abstract

We are interested in whether Preferential Trade Agreements facilitate attainment of Global Free Trade. Using a numerical general equilibrium model based on global trade data aggregated to 5 regions and 12 goods, we calculate the optimal tariffs in a Nash tariff-setting game when regions are free to form trading blocs. Using Riezman’s (1999) notion of blocking coalitions, we determine endogenously whichtradingbloc structures emerge when regions can form Free Trade Areas or Customs Unions. We nd that Global Free Trade may not be an equilibrium outcome unless constraints are placed on the way Customs Unions set their Common External Tariffs.

Suggested Citation

  • Fisher, Timothy C.G. & Waschik, Robert G., 2006. "A Numerical General Equilibrium Model with Endogenous Formation of Trading Blocs," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 21, pages 881-914.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:integr:0382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James A. Giesecke & Nhi H. Tran & Robert Waschik, 2021. "Should Australia be concerned by Beijing’s trade threats: modelling the economic costs of a restriction on imports of Australian coal," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(1), pages 1-22, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Endogenous coalition formation; Preferential trade agreements;

    JEL classification:

    • C68 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computable General Equilibrium Models
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:integr:0382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yunhoe Kim (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desejkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.