IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ijheha/0008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Functional and Chemical Properties of Composite Flour made from Unripe Plantain (Musa Paradisiaca) and Cocoyam (Colocasia Esculenta) and Assessment of Consumers’ Acceptability of Amala

Author

Listed:
  • Nwanagba, Nkeiruka L.

    (Department of Food Science and Technology, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria)

  • Ukom, Anthony N.

    (Department of Food Science and Technology, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria)

  • Okoli, Justina N.

    (Department of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria)

  • Abonyi, Charity O.

    (Department of Food Science and Technology, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria)

  • Okparauka, Immaculata I.

    (Science Laboratory Technology Biochemistry Unit, Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Uwana Afikpo, Ebonyi State, Nigeria)

  • Ubadire-Agua, Chinechendu

    (Department of Food Science and Technology, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria)

Abstract

The study evaluated the functional and chemical properties of composite flour produced using unripe plantain and cocoyam and consumer acceptability of amala. Unripe plantain and cocoyam tests acquired from Orie-ugba market in Umuahia were washed, stripped, cut and dried in a stove for 24 h at 60 0C albeit the cocoyam cuts were drenched for 6 h with irregular difference in water after each 2 h. The doused cocoyam was rewashed, depleted and whitened for 4 minutes followed by drying in a broiler at 57±3 oC and processing to get flour test. The two flours (plantain flour: cocoyam flour), were formed into various extents, 40:60: 50:50 and 60:40. The control was 100 % plantain. The examples were exposed to examinations utilizing standard techniques. The aftereffects of the functional properties showed that the mass thickness went from 0.77 to 0.91 g/ml, gelatinization limit 8-12 enlarging record 29.12 to 34.02 while water ingestion limit went from 1.29 to 3.64 g/ml. The pH values went from 5.88 to 6.75. Test B(100% cocoyam flour) had the most noteworthy flavonoid content of 49.75 mg while test A (100 percent plantain flour) had the least worth (0.67 mg). The carotenoid content went from 0.73 to 48.82 µg. Test B was fundamentally unique (p

Suggested Citation

  • Nwanagba, Nkeiruka L. & Ukom, Anthony N. & Okoli, Justina N. & Abonyi, Charity O. & Okparauka, Immaculata I. & Ubadire-Agua, Chinechendu, 2022. "Evaluation of Functional and Chemical Properties of Composite Flour made from Unripe Plantain (Musa Paradisiaca) and Cocoyam (Colocasia Esculenta) and Assessment of Consumers’ Acceptability of Amala," International Journal of Home Economics, Hospitality and Allied Research, Department of Home Economics & Hospitality Management Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, vol. 1(2), pages 246-256, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:ijheha:0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijhhr.org/wp-content/uploads/10.57012ijhhr.v1n2.008.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Amala; Chemical composition; Cocoyam; Composite flour; Consumers’ acceptability; Functional properties; Unripe plantain;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I00 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ijheha:0008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Homec Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dhunnng.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.