IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/buecrj/0683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Reporting Quality: A Comparative Analysis of Private Sector Companies with TOPSIS

Author

Listed:
  • Özcan, İrem

    (Haliç University)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the quality of the integrated reports of private sector companies for 2023 and to rank the companies included in the study according to the quality scores of their integrated reports. For this purpose, the 2023 integrated reports of 27 private sector companies operating in various fields were obtained from the Integrated Reporting Network Turkey page and subjected to content analysis and then analyzed using the integrated reporting quality measurement technique based on four main components: background, reliability and assurance, content, and format. A total of 23 sub-categories were analyzed under the four components and the results were ranked using the TOPSIS method. The findings show that companies operating in the same sector score quite close to each other. In particular, the scores of companies in the banking and manufacturing sectors are close to each other.

Suggested Citation

  • Özcan, İrem, 2025. "Integrated Reporting Quality: A Comparative Analysis of Private Sector Companies with TOPSIS," Business and Economics Research Journal, Uludag University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 16(2), pages 137-158, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:buecrj:0683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.berjournal.com/integrated-reporting-quality-a-comparative-analysis-of-private-sector-companies-with-topsis
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Integrated Reporting; Integrated Reporting Quality; Integrated Report; Non-Financial Reporting; TOPSIS;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M49 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:buecrj:0683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adem Anbar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiulutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.