IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/buecrj/023235.html

Does Field of Study Shape the Hourly Wage Distribution? Evidence from Quantile Regression

Author

Listed:
  • Hayriye Özgül Özkan Değirmenci

    (Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University)

Abstract

Higher education expansion in Türkiye has sharply increased the supply of bachelor’s degree graduates, yet how field of study is associated with wages across the conditional wage distribution remains insufficiently examined. Using 2024 Household Labour Force Survey microdata, this study estimates weighted conditional quantile regressions for bachelor’s degree wage workers. Fields are grouped using ISCED-F 2013, with Business and Law as the reference category. Results reveal substantial distributional heterogeneity in field-of-study wage associations. Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics graduates show the largest and most distribution-sensitive conditional wage advantage, increasing from lower to upper conditional quantiles. Education graduates exhibit a hump-shaped profile peaking at Q75, while Health and Veterinary graduates show a declining association from Q10 to Q90. These patterns are consistent with differences in sectoral allocation, public-sector concentration, and institutionally structured wage-setting, but should be interpreted as conditional associations rather than causal returns. Humanities and Arts graduates do not display statistically significant wage associations at individual quantiles. Overall, the findings show that OLS estimates mask important distributional differences and support more systematic monitoring of field-specific labor market outcomes in higher education planning and career guidance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hayriye Özgül Özkan Değirmenci, 2026. "Does Field of Study Shape the Hourly Wage Distribution? Evidence from Quantile Regression," Business and Economics Research Journal, Bursa Uludag University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 17(3), pages 377-401, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:buecrj:023235
    DOI: 10.20409/berj.2026.503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.berjournal.com/does-field-of-study-shape-the-hourly-wage-distribution-evidence-from-quantile-regression
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20409/berj.2026.503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • I26 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Returns to Education
    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:buecrj:023235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adem Anbar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiulutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.