IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rge/journl/v1y2014i2p31-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prácticas Participativas y Capital Social. Una perspectiva desde el Plan Maestro de Intervención Urbana de la ZOCM (Participatory Practices and Social Capital. A View from the Urban Intervention Master Plan for ZOCM)

Author

Listed:
  • Leticia Alcaraz Zubeldia

    (Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - Xochimilco)

Abstract

Spanish abstract. Desde la Comisión de Brundtland la sustentabilidad surge como un concepto en el cual lo social cobra gran importancia para promover el desarrollo sostenible en las naciones, asumiendo que la pobreza y la degradación medioambiental son aspectos relacionados que constituyen la pérdida de oportunidades y recursos, haciendo un llamado para el cambio de la política pública de cada gobierno , y es a partir de entonces cuando a través de la llamada “democratización de la vida pública”, los diferentes actores sociales trabajan de manera conjunta con cada gobierno, a fin de mejorar su ámbito socioeconómico. Los cuales han reclamado su participación directa en asuntos concernientes a su ámbito socioeconómico, sin embargo, hasta el momento no se ha evaluado el enorme potencial que el capital humano, relacional y estructural pude ofrecer para fortalecer las prácticas participativas como un nuevo escenario de lo colectivo y eje articulador de una nueva esfera política. English abstract. Since the Brundtland Commission, sustainability has emerged as a concept in which the social becomes very important to promote sustainable development in nations, assuming that poverty and environmental degradation are related aspects in the loss of opportunities and resources and calling for a change in public policy of each government. Is thereafter when through the ‘democratization of public life’, the different social actors work together with each government to improve their socio-economic level. these social actors have claimed direct involvement in matters concerning their socioeconomic level, however, so far has not been assessed the enormous potential that the human, relational and structural capital could provide to strengthen participatory practices as a new collective scenery and driving force of a new political sphere.

Suggested Citation

  • Leticia Alcaraz Zubeldia, 2014. "Prácticas Participativas y Capital Social. Una perspectiva desde el Plan Maestro de Intervención Urbana de la ZOCM (Participatory Practices and Social Capital. A View from the Urban Intervention Maste," Revista Internacional de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Tecnología (GECONTEC), Revista Internacional de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Tecnología (GECONTEC), vol. 2(1), pages 31-39.
  • Handle: RePEc:rge:journl:v:1:y:2014:i:2:p:31-39
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7080542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://gecontec.org/index.php/unesco/article/view/50/40
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.7080542?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Capital Social; Sustentabilidad y Democracia;

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rge:journl:v:1:y:2014:i:2:p:31-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Luis Camilo Ortigueira Sánchez (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.gecontec.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.