IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v2y2014i1p18-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dilemma of Empowerment: Responsibility Attribution in Prison Counseling

Author

Listed:
  • Guo Jing-ying

Abstract

Prison counseling as a new intervening tool to reform inmates in China has provided a site in which inmates could have more rights to confidentiality or equality and be motivated towards positive change. In actual practice, however, there are occasions in which the police counselors do not seem to act as facilitators and helpers as they are supposed to. This paper, drawing on discursive psychology, looks into how the police counselors attribute responsibility for the problems that drive the inmate clients to the counseling by focusing on variant cases. Analysis reveals that two main discursive devices, tag questions and reformulation, are employed by the police counselors in an attempt to deflect responsibility for the problems of the inmate clients and the solution to these problems from the prison and stakeholders within the prison. Prison counseling is caught in a dilemma of empowerment.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo Jing-ying, 2014. "Dilemma of Empowerment: Responsibility Attribution in Prison Counseling," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 18-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:2:y:2014:i:1:p:18-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/347/290
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/347
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    discursive psychology; empowerment; responsibility attribution; discursive device;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:2:y:2014:i:1:p:18-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.