IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v1y2013i1p140-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Loyal Dissent in the Chinese Blogosphere: Sina Weibo Discourse on the Chinese Communist Party

Author

Listed:
  • Johan Lagerkvist
  • Gustav Sundqvist

Abstract

The impact of the Internet on Chinese politics is a hot topic in contemporary academic debate. Some scholars believe that political discussions in cyberspace will lead to a more pluralistic and democratic China. Others argue that the ruling Communist Party will strengthen its position by using the Internet as a tool for censorship and active propaganda. The purpose of this article is to contribute to the debate on the political impact of increasing Internet use, by studying uncensored online opinions about the Communist Party and its policies. More specifically, we investigate and analyze some of the most popular and uncensored microblog tweets (Sina Weibo) that discussed political scandals in China during the Spring of 2012. The findings show that a majority of the tweets contains criticism against certain activities of the Party, but do not challenge its hold on power. The study indicates that the phenomenon of loyal dissent is a distinguishing feature of online political discourse in contemporary China. Consequently, the blogosphere has the potential to foster a generation of more critical Chinese citizens. However, in the current phase of overall information repression and censorship, and as a particular form of online expression, microblogging cannot yet be considered a catalyst for democratization.

Suggested Citation

  • Johan Lagerkvist & Gustav Sundqvist, 2013. "Loyal Dissent in the Chinese Blogosphere: Sina Weibo Discourse on the Chinese Communist Party," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 140-149, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:140-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/121/106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/121
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minos-Athanasios Karyotakis & Nikos Panagiotou & Nikos Antonopoulos & Matina Kiourexidou, 2017. "Digital Media Framing of the Egyptian Arab Spring: Comparing Al Jazeera, BBC and China Daily," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 66-75, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Internet; China; censorship; Sina; Weibo; microblogging; CCP; loyal dissent; blogosphere; civil society;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:140-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.