IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v14y2026i2p428-435.html

Cross-Cultural Semiotics of Emoji Use: A Comparative Content Analysis of Hands Pressed Together, Skull, and Peach

Author

Listed:
  • Sarvenaz Safavi

Abstract

Although emojis are often hailed as a universal digital language, their meanings changes across cultures. By focusing on three polysemic examples—(hands pressed together), (skull), and (peach)—this study examines how interpretations shift across English, Japanese, Hindi, Arabic, Spanish, and Chinese contexts. Also, this research combines content analysis with semiotic approach grounded in Saussurean, Peircean, and Barthesian theory. Results reveal clear divergences- hands pressed together signifies "prayer" in English, "gratitude/politeness" in Japanese, and "Namaste" in Indian discourse; skull denotes "death" in Arabic, "humor" in Western slang, and "ancestral ritual" in Mexican culture; peach represents sexual slang in English, fruit in European posts, and longevity in Chinese folklore. These findings demonstrate that emojis are culturally embedded, polysemic signs shaped by ideology, ritual, and online vernaculars, challenging the notion of emojis as neutral or universal symbols and positioning the study as an exploratory contribution to cross-cultural in digital semiotics.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarvenaz Safavi, 2026. "Cross-Cultural Semiotics of Emoji Use: A Comparative Content Analysis of Hands Pressed Together, Skull, and Peach," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 14(2), pages 428-435, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:14:y:2026:i:2:p:428-435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/download/8168/7278
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/8168
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:14:y:2026:i:2:p:428-435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.