IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v14y2026i2p135-149.html

Framing the Chinese Government during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis of BBC and CNN's Digital Video News Coverage

Author

Listed:
  • Zhuang Jiang
  • Juliana Abdul Wahab

Abstract

This study examines how BBC and CNN portrayed the Chinese government in COVID-19 digital video news. Using quantitative content analysis, 724 videos published between June 2019 and June 2020 (BBC = 189; CNN = 535) were coded for tone (positive/neutral/negative) and five generic news frames (responsibility, conflict, human interest, economic consequences, morality). Two trained coders double-coded 20% of the sample (Cohen's κ = 0.85). Results show that both outlets overwhelmingly relied on the responsibility frame (BBC- 91.5%; CNN- 90.4%). BBC used human-interest framing more frequently (41.1%) than CNN (6.5%), whereas CNN employed economic consequences framing more often (9.5%). Tone was predominantly neutral in both outlets (BBC- 69.84%; CNN- 73.46%), with moderate negative coverage and minimal positive portrayals. A chi-square test indicated no significant difference in tone distribution between BBC and CNN (χ²(2, N = 724) = 2.290, p = .318). The findings suggest convergent accountability-centered framing of China's pandemic response in Western digital video news.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhuang Jiang & Juliana Abdul Wahab, 2026. "Framing the Chinese Government during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis of BBC and CNN's Digital Video News Coverage," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 14(2), pages 135-149, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:14:y:2026:i:2:p:135-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/download/8157/7158
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/8157
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:14:y:2026:i:2:p:135-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.