IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v14y2026i2p1-12.html

Spike Protein Shedding on Reddit: Analyzing Online Discussions of an Anti-Vax Conspiracy Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Siobhan Flanagan
  • Romin W. Tafarodi

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020-2023, public opposition to vaccination was fueled in large part by online misinformation and disinformation. This content included a range of conspiracy theories that were shared on social media platforms. These theories spread rapidly and proved remarkably resistant to elimination through debunking. To shed light on this phenomenon, we conducted a qualitative examination of the "spike protein shedding" theory that gained prominence in 2021 on Reddit, a popular news and discussion platform. The theory centered on the claim that a harmful component of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines could be transmitted from vaccinated to unvaccinated individuals, presenting a significant health hazard. Some of those propounding the theory also claimed that government agencies and/or vaccine manufacturers were aware of the risk but chose to conceal it from the public. A thematic analysis of 63 Reddit threads taken from various subreddits revealed themes and patterns in how the topic was discussed by posters and those who responded to their posts. The results revealed that the theory was subject to surprisingly little critical debate on Reddit. Discussions instead took place in subreddit communities that functioned more as affinity spaces- Posters mainly invited and received support and/or advice from community members to shore up their existing beliefs on the issue and negatively caricatured those who disagreed with them rather than engaging with the substance of opposing arguments. The findings help explain the resilience of conspiracy theories that are shared online.

Suggested Citation

  • Siobhan Flanagan & Romin W. Tafarodi, 2026. "Spike Protein Shedding on Reddit: Analyzing Online Discussions of an Anti-Vax Conspiracy Theory," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:14:y:2026:i:2:p:1-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/download/8114/7123
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/8114
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:14:y:2026:i:2:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.