IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v13y2025i4p43-55.html

Communicating Health Through Images: How Social Media Visuals Shape Body Comparison in Chinese Young Women

Author

Listed:
  • Siyi Song
  • Hamedi Mohd Adnan
  • Muhamad Shamsul Ibrahim

Abstract

Social media has intensified appearance-related pressures among young women, especially in cultures that idealize thinness. In China, the widespread circulation of idealized body imagery online poses challenges to women's body satisfaction and self-perception. This study explores how different types of social media images influence appearance-based social comparison from a media and health communication perspective. A between-subjects experimental design was employed with 369 female Chinese university students randomly assigned to view one of five image types- thin-ideal posed, thin-ideal functional, full-figured posed, full-figured functional, or neutral scenery. After exposure, participants completed a measure of appearance comparison. ANOVA and post-hoc analyses showed that participants exposed to images of human models—regardless of body type or pose—reported significantly higher appearance comparison levels than those who viewed neutral scenery. No significant differences were found between the four model image groups. Findings suggest that the presence of human figures alone may trigger appearance comparison, highlighting the powerful visual influence of media content. This study offers practical insights into digital image design and supports the inclusion of neutral, non-human visuals in media strategies aimed at promoting healthier self-image among young women.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyi Song & Hamedi Mohd Adnan & Muhamad Shamsul Ibrahim, 2025. "Communicating Health Through Images: How Social Media Visuals Shape Body Comparison in Chinese Young Women," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 13(4), pages 43-55, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:43-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/download/7690/6936
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/7690
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:43-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.