IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v13y2025i4p161-172.html

How Unofficial Media Use Shapes Perceptions of Political Transparency: The Mediating Effect of Subjective Well-Being and the Moderating Role of Official Media Use Among Chinese Youth

Author

Listed:
  • Xianlu Zhao
  • Moniza Waheed
  • Adlina Ab. Halim
  • Zhuang Tian
  • Tao Yuan

Abstract

This study examines the impact of unofficial media use on perceived government transparency in Chinese youth, focusing on the mediating role of subjective well-being and the moderating influence of official media use. Based on a cross-sectional survey of 405 participants aged 18-35 in Guangzhou, China, the results indicated that frequent use of unofficial media significantly reduced perceptions of political transparency, consistent with the media depression theory. In addition, subjective well-being played a critical mediating role in this relationship, while official media use mitigated the negative impact of unofficial media use. These results provide valuable insights into the role of the media in the political context and inform strategies for enhancing government transparency.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianlu Zhao & Moniza Waheed & Adlina Ab. Halim & Zhuang Tian & Tao Yuan, 2025. "How Unofficial Media Use Shapes Perceptions of Political Transparency: The Mediating Effect of Subjective Well-Being and the Moderating Role of Official Media Use Among Chinese Youth," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 13(4), pages 161-172, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:161-172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/download/7656/6978
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/7656
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:161-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.