IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v13y2025i2p360-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of Conceptual Metaphors in Donald Trump’s 2024 Victory Speech

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Thi Bich Giang
  • Tran Xuan Hiep

Abstract

This study analyzes the use of Conceptual Metaphors in Donald Trump's 2024 victory remark to focus on how these factors shape his rhetorical strategies and communicate his political vision. By examining the frequencies and functions of Ontological, Structural and Orientational Metaphors, the research reveals how he makes abstract political concepts more tangible and accessible to his audience. Ontological Metaphors (54%) dominate the speech to allow complex ideas such as national unity and progress to be conceptualized as physical entities to make his message more relatable and emotionally compelling. Structural Metaphors (33.5%) help to organize abstract ideas to provide clarity and a sense of order while Orientational Metaphors (12.5%) emphasize spatial direction and forward movement. The findings highlight the central role of Ontological Metaphors in simplifying complex political concepts to foster optimism and inspire confidence in the future. The study provides valuable insights for political communicators, educators, and researchers and offers a deeper understanding of how metaphor usage influences public perception and voter sentiment.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Thi Bich Giang & Tran Xuan Hiep, 2025. "An Analysis of Conceptual Metaphors in Donald Trump’s 2024 Victory Speech," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 13(2), pages 360-372, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:360-372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/download/7659/6864
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/7659
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:360-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.