Author
Listed:
- Nada Adel Hanafi Mahmoud Attia
- Nourhan Tosson Ibrahim Ahmed
Abstract
Purpose- This study explores TikTok’s potential as a new space for engagement within Egypt’s media landscape. This study addresses three core questions- 1) What motivates users to discuss public issues on TikTok? 2) How do Egyptians use TikTok for online civic participation? 3) Does TikTok support the emergence of a public sphere in Egypt?Design/methodology/approach- Using qualitative research approach, this study conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with Egyptian TikTok users aged 18 to 35 from diverse socio-economic backgrounds. Thematic coding was applied to analyze their motivations on TikTok’s role in civic engagement.Practical implications- This research highlights the challenges of using TikTok as a platform for civic engagement in Egypt. Policymakers, media scholars, and digital activists should consider how platform design and algorithmic curation influence political discourse and explore ways to enhance TikTok’s potential for meaningful public debate in Egypt.Results- The study found that while users engage with public issues mainly out of curiosity or entertainment, their involvement is mostly passive, limited to liking and sharing videos. Very few participants create original content or engage in meaningful discussions. TikTok’s algorithm prioritizes entertainment driven content, which limits its effectiveness as a space for substantive political discourse. Reflecting Habermas’s concept of “pseudo-public sphere,†TikTok operates as “limited public sphere,†fostering surface-level discussions that rarely translate into real world democratic engagement.Originality/value- This study fills a gap in the literature by offering empirical insights into TikTok’s role in shaping public discourse in Egypt.
Suggested Citation
Nada Adel Hanafi Mahmoud Attia & Nourhan Tosson Ibrahim Ahmed, 2025.
"Is TikTok a Public Sphere for Democracy in Egypt? The Application of Habermas’s “Pseudo-Public Sphereâ€,"
Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 13(2), pages 336-341, June.
Handle:
RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:336-341
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:336-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.