IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v11y2023i6p244-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Good News – Bad News. Proportion between Positive and Negative Headlines in the Global News Feed (Based on the Google News Aggregator)

Author

Listed:
  • Iurii Melnyk
  • Andriy Melnyk
  • Yaryna Pryshliak
  • Olesia Melnyk
  • Anastasia Soroka
  • Viktoria Churevych
  • Rasha El-Ibiary
  • Delfina Ertanowska
  • Huayu Sun

Abstract

This article tests the assertion about the dominance of the negative agenda in the media space. To this end, Google News, the world’s largest news aggregator, was taken into account, on the basis of which the ratio of positive and negative news headlines in the information flow was analyzed. Three stages of research were conducted, each one week long with 16 country versions of Google News. In total, it was considered a little less than half a million news headlines. According to the results, 70.54% of the headlines turned out to be positive. This outcome questions the stereotype of the dominance of negative agendas in the global news stream. As it turned out, the ratio of positive and negative news depends on the language (versions of Google News in one language showed very similar results) and the day of the week (the news is a little more positive on Sundays), but does not depend on the level of freedom of speech, cultural and geographical factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Iurii Melnyk & Andriy Melnyk & Yaryna Pryshliak & Olesia Melnyk & Anastasia Soroka & Viktoria Churevych & Rasha El-Ibiary & Delfina Ertanowska & Huayu Sun, 2023. "Good News – Bad News. Proportion between Positive and Negative Headlines in the Global News Feed (Based on the Google News Aggregator)," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 11(6), pages 244-260, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:11:y:2023:i:6:p:244-260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/download/6146/6243
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/6146
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:11:y:2023:i:6:p:244-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.