IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v9y2021i5p153-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Salience of Traditional Moral Values: Bolsonaro’s Electoral Competition Strategy on Twitter

Author

Listed:
  • Sylvia Iasulaitis
  • Isabella Vicari

Abstract

This article analyzes the electoral competition strategy adopted by the Brazilian presidential candidate Jair Bolsonaro on Twitter, supported by the saliency theory – where candidates compete by emphasizing different topics and selecting issues from a universal agenda to focus the campaign’s attention and efforts. The salience Bolsonaro’s winning campaign attributed to values during the 2018 presidential election. Values are attitudinal guidelines related to different social, religious, economic, and political concepts, covering various topics on views about what is desirable or undesirable in a society. The study used content analysis to explore and categorize a corpus of 809 tweets posted in the account @jairbolsonaro. The data was mined by applying computational intelligence methods and using the public API and the Python Twint library. Four dimensions of cultural variance found in the World Values Survey were used to establish the categories- traditional values, rational-secular values, survival values, and self-expression values. The results show that the content of Bolsonaro’s electoral competition strategy was based on traditional moral values and the campaign’s format was developed primarily via social media.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvia Iasulaitis & Isabella Vicari, 2021. "The Salience of Traditional Moral Values: Bolsonaro’s Electoral Competition Strategy on Twitter," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 9(5), pages 153-165, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:9:y:2021:i:5:p:153-165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/download/5313/5556
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/5313
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:9:y:2021:i:5:p:153-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.