IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v4y2016i7p63-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

¡°It¡¯s the National Ethos, Stupid¡±! ¨C Understanding the Political Psychology of the Israeli 2015 Elections Using Data from the National Resilience Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Eyal Lewin

Abstract

From a socio-political point of view, the results of the Israeli 2015 elections reflect an ongoing stagnation that is described in detail in this research. This stagnation is often explained by theories of social collective identities. However, none of the theories examines how group identities are created. Consequently, this study explains how different forms of national ethos shape political identities and interweave with them. Relying on a wide set of data from the National Resilience Survey launched by the National Security Studies Center at Haifa University, this research examines the way Israeli political parties differ according to voters' attitudes on matters of national ethos. The findings show how opposing parties correspond with the two distinct forms of national ethos. However, the data also reveals that the ethos clash is not necessarily a dichotomy, but rather a continuum where various parties are located along a spectrum between the poles.

Suggested Citation

  • Eyal Lewin, 2016. "¡°It¡¯s the National Ethos, Stupid¡±! ¨C Understanding the Political Psychology of the Israeli 2015 Elections Using Data from the National Resilience Survey," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(7), pages 63-74, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:4:y:2016:i:7:p:63-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/1651/1704
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/1651
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    group identity; national ethos; voter behavior; political stagnation; republicanism; liberalism.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:4:y:2016:i:7:p:63-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.