IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v4y2016i2p29-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanisms of Progress in Organic and Cultural Evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Borje Ekstig

Abstract

Due to the randomly changing environmental conditions in which natural selection is acting, it is hard to see how this process could give evolution the steady direction of a large-scale incessant progress. In the present article I propose a solution to this dilemma by the application of the concept of complexity as a measure of evolutionary progress, a notion that I have developed in a descriptive way in previous works. By means of the concept of complexity one can conceive of the evolutionary process as having a stable direction towards ever-increasing complexity. The explanatory mechanism behind this trend is in the present work suggested to be found in the combined actions of natural selection, competition, feedback, arms race, and sexual selection. These mechanisms are discussed at length, being applicable not only in organic evolution but in human cultural and social evolution as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Borje Ekstig, 2016. "Mechanisms of Progress in Organic and Cultural Evolution," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 29-37, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:29-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/1301/1308
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/1301
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Evolution; Culture; Complexity; Competition; Feedback; Language acquisition; Sexual selection; Arms race.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:29-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.