IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v4y2016i10p101-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electronic Health Records and Patient Empowerment in US: from the Legal Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Liu

Abstract

Objective: to examine the American electronic health records from a legal perspective. Results: the EHR system presents characteristics from the five aspects: accessibility, coordination, sustained care, decision making, and privacy. Conclusion: The US law in the field of Patient-Centered Health Information Technology has many elements of patient empowerment. There is still a gap between the system is and the system should be. It is found that first, A mandatory adoption of EHR system; second, privacy should be further ensured; and third, the accessibility should be further improved.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Liu, 2016. "Electronic Health Records and Patient Empowerment in US: from the Legal Perspective," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(10), pages 101-105, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:4:y:2016:i:10:p:101-105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/1877/1932
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/1877
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Electronic Health Records; Health Law; Patient¡¯s Health Information;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:4:y:2016:i:10:p:101-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.