IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v2y2014i4p17-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The World Bank¡¯s Discourse on Social Inequality: A Policy of Appeasement?

Author

Listed:
  • Olivia G. Merritt
  • Neena L. Chappell

Abstract

Locating ¡®social justice¡¯ and ¡®social consciousness¡¯ as new buzzwords in dominant economic development paradigms, this paper explores the contradictions between discourse and economic structure in recent social policy programs implemented through World Bank involvement in Latin America (2000-2012). The authors use a critical discourse analysis technique to analyze official World Bank documents pertaining to two projects, the Jefes de Hogar (Argentina) and the Bolsa Familia (Brazil). The study concluded that social justice/quality of life discourse was used in a superficial manner, with the overarching goals of World Bank social policy remaining to be the hegemonic safeguarding of global neoliberal economic-political structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivia G. Merritt & Neena L. Chappell, 2014. "The World Bank¡¯s Discourse on Social Inequality: A Policy of Appeasement?," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 2(4), pages 17-27, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:2:y:2014:i:4:p:17-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/446/391
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/446
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social inequality; Latin America; human capital; development discourses; World Bank; neoliberalism.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:2:y:2014:i:4:p:17-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.