IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v2y2014i2p86-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students¡¯ Perceived Quality of Distance Education Courses as a Correlate of Learner Satisfaction: A Case Study of the Bachelor of Education Arts Program, University of Nairobi, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Joyce Kanini Mbwesa

Abstract

Distance education (DE) has in the past few decades evolved into a complex and dynamic instructional approach that is feeding discussions that range from the quality of learning supported by this mode of delivery to the efficacy of the approach. One of the key discussions that has attracted interest and research in this approach of instructional delivery is the construct of quality and quality assurance in Distance education courses. Quality in distance education has largely and often been studied from national and institutional administrative and faculty stand points. Very few studies have analyzed quality in DE from the learners¡¯ perspectives. This study analyzed the construct of quality as perceived by the distance learner and the influence of this perception on the students¡¯ satisfaction with the DE course. In Particular, the analysis focused on identifying students perceptions of key variables that define the construct of quality from their perspective. A questionnaire, Students Perceived quality in DE questionnaire (SPQQ) constructed by the researcher was used as the key tool of data collection. Descriptive and correlational statistics were the main tools of analysis used. Results of the study clearly indicated that the theory predictor variables (SPQP, SPQI, SPQC, and SPQE ) were all positively correlated with perceived students satisfaction with the DE course. Learners particularly seemed to value fair and clear learning assessment guidelines and periodic students¡¯ evaluation of teaching and learning. The study points to the conclusion that institutions must pay attention to factors such as quality of pedagogy, learner support, technological and even physical infrastructure structure as a measure of meeting students¡¯ quality expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Joyce Kanini Mbwesa, 2014. "Students¡¯ Perceived Quality of Distance Education Courses as a Correlate of Learner Satisfaction: A Case Study of the Bachelor of Education Arts Program, University of Nairobi, Kenya," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 86-99, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:2:y:2014:i:2:p:86-99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/358/301
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/358
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ernest Adu-Gyamfi & Paul Kwadwo Addo & Charles Asamoah-Boateng, 2019. "An Examination of Differences between the Mean Indicator Ratings by Different Stakeholders in Distance Education Programme," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(4), pages 1-72, August.
    2. Santiago Batista-Toledo & Diana Gavilan, 2023. "Student Experience, Satisfaction and Commitment in Blended Learning: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    3. M. J. Perera & Gapar Johar & Ali Kathibi & Halinah Atan & Nalin Abeysekera & Isuri Dharmaratne, 2017. "PLS-SEM Based Analysis of Service Quality and Satisfaction in Open Distance Learning in Sri Lanka," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(11), pages 194-194, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Students¡¯ perceived quality; perceived students¡¯ satisfaction; quality of pedagogy; learner support; technological infrastructure;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:2:y:2014:i:2:p:86-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.