IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

How Social Workers Portray Children¡¯s Perceptions When Constructing Their Identities

Listed author(s):
  • Elin Hultman
  • Ann-Christin Cederborg
Registered author(s):

    Constructions of institutional identities are necessary when assessing children¡¯s needs and making intervention decisions. To be able to make holistic descriptions of children¡¯s identities, social workers have to listen to children¡¯s perceptions of themselves and their surroundings. In this study we explore how social workers construct children¡¯s identities when portraying the children¡¯s perceptions in social investigations conducted according to the BBIC model when concerns have been expressed about the children¡¯s health. Inspired by a discursive analytical approach, we focused on the language used. We analysed descriptions of children¡¯s perceptions in 35 written investigations. We found that in terms of words used, the children¡¯s perceptions were given greater attention than those of parents and others (e.g. teachers, doctors). When focusing on the quality of these constructions, the main patterns found were that social workers more frequently submitted non-explanatory rather than explanatory descriptions. We also found that social workers differ in the way they handle the task of reporting children¡¯s voices. These findings indicate that the use of the BBIC manual needs to be developed to ensure children are not just listened to and their perceptions described, but also that children are constructed as agents of their life. To obtain a holistic view of children¡¯s life-world, there is a need of identity descriptions that include details of how children understand their problems, what they experience as positive and what is acceptable support for them.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Redfame publishing in its journal International Journal of Social Science Studies.

    Volume (Year): 1 (2013)
    Issue (Month): 2 (October)
    Pages: 73-81

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:2:p:73-81
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    CDM - CEMI, Odyssea, Station 5, CH - 1015 Lausanne

    Phone: +41 21 693 0036
    Fax: +41 21 693 0020
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:2:p:73-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Redfame publishing)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.