IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v1y2013i2p44-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Am I Interviewing? Understanding the Fundamental Relation in Social Research

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew W. Metcalfe

Abstract

The last twenty years have seen an increasing emphasis on the role of the subject both in sociological theory and in methodological guides on the unstructured qualitative research interview. I will argue that this emphasis on subjects is misplaced and cannot lead to a clear understanding of social relations or sociological interviewing. To make this argument I will look at what could be taken as the basic social relation in social research: the qualitative interview between sociologist and research participant. I will argue that major methodological problems arise when interviewees are addressed as identified subjects and when interviews are understood as exchanges between subjects. I will also argue that sociologists who presume subjectivity in this way are not clear about the methodology of interviews because they are not clear about the basic logic of social relation. As well as trying to clarify this logic, I will also try to draw out some of the practical implications of a genuinely social understanding of the interview.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew W. Metcalfe, 2013. "Who Am I Interviewing? Understanding the Fundamental Relation in Social Research," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 44-54, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:2:p:44-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/123/150
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/123
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    subjectivity; relational ontology; qualitative research; interviews; Martin Buber; ethics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:2:p:44-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.