IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v14y2026i2p22-30.html

Creativity versus Artificial Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Daniele Schilirò

Abstract

This article examines the evolving relationship between human creativity and artificial intelligence, focusing on the transformative impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on the landscape of human expression. By investigating the inherent tension between algorithmic processing and innate human cognition, this conceptual study acknowledges AI as an indispensable tool for synthesizing complex datasets and automating functional tasks across diverse sectors. However, its role within the creative domain remains highly contested. This inquiry posits a fundamental cognitive risk arising from the hybridization of the creative process, noting that human cognitive evolution is failing to keep pace with the accelerating velocity of AI development. Through an analysis of the works of historical masters such as Caravaggio, Picasso, and Leopardi, the article argues for the inherent ontological superiority of human creativity, which is rooted in a unique capacity to transmit complex emotion and aesthetic depth. The comparative case study method enables the identification of theoretical models in human-artificial intelligence interaction. Ultimately, the study evaluates whether GenAI functions as a sophisticated augmentative tool or a disruptive force capable of eroding the exclusive cognitive functions that define human artistic mastery.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniele Schilirò, 2026. "Creativity versus Artificial Intelligence," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 14(2), pages 22-30, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:14:y:2026:i:2:p:22-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/download/8704/7284
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/8704
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:14:y:2026:i:2:p:22-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.