Author
Abstract
Religious and spiritual involvement (R/S) plays a significant role in the mental health of many Americans, yet the nature of this relationship remains complex. Current empirical evidence from systematic reviews, longitudinal studies, and clinical trials demonstrates predominantly protective effects of R/S across major psychiatric disorders, with higher religious engagement generally associated with reduced depression and substance use, enhanced resilience following trauma, and improved outcomes in several other conditions. However, the relationship proves notably bidirectional, as religious struggle, negative religious coping, and certain doctrinal beliefs can exacerbate symptoms, particularly in obsessive-compulsive disorder through scrupulosity and in depression when spiritual conflicts arise. The magnitude of protective effects remains modest, with considerable variation across populations, cultural contexts, and measurement approaches. For anxiety disorders, findings remain inconsistent, with approximately half of studies showing benefits while others report null or negative effects. Substance use disorders show the most robust inverse relationship with R/S, while eating disorders and personality disorders demonstrate limited and conflicting evidence. Understanding these complex patterns has significant implications for clinical practice, supporting the integration of spiritual assessment and religiously informed interventions into mental health care while highlighting the critical need to distinguish adaptive from maladaptive religious cognitions. Future research must address fundamental gaps including the lack of mechanistic understanding, geographic bias toward American populations, and the need for validated assessment tools that can capture the multidimensional nature of religious experience and its varied impacts on psychological well-being.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.