Author
Listed:
- Alireza Hirad
- Mahmoodreza Rakhshani
Abstract
This research examines the relationship between the type of auditor's report and disclosure domain quality of the pharmaceutical companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange. The research method is inductive and is categorized in applied research according to research purpose. Research method and data analysis method is done using multiple correlation coefficient models and multiple regression. The statistical population of this study was all pharmaceutical companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange during the years 2010-2014, which 488 companies have been selected. In this research, CD-ROMs and statistical software of Tehran Stock Exchange and other software available in Tehran stock exchange have been used to collect data in the present research. To document the results, statistical analysis and presenting final solutions, the researcher analyzed the questions and hypothesis using a statistical method as well as 7 Eviews software. The results of the main hypothesis of research show that there is a significant relationship between the type of audit report and disclosure domain quality in pharmaceutical companies. Given that disclosure domain quality of accounting information, documentation and clarification by the client after the issuance of the draft report and the client's attempt to justify the auditor are effective factors in disclosure domain quality, since increased disclosure quality has improved the financial reporting as well as the quality of the auditors' opinion. Increasing the quality can provide the necessary background for ease of implementation of the audit process, reduce audit risks, and ultimately reduce the auditors 'pessimism to the investigative body, each of which can more accurately report auditors' reports more qualitatively. The results also show that Audit Report has a higher degree of desirability to the extent that managers cooperate with the auditors in providing relevant and quality information and provide realistic and accurate information without any distortion or fraud and will show audit reports more qualitatively.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:5:y:2018:i:1:p:45-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.