IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/aefjnl/v3y2016i2p73-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting the Monthly Effect for the Chinese Stock Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Chin-Shan Hsieh

Abstract

This study uses stochastic dominance (SD) theory, a distribution-free, omitted risk-adjusted method and allowing investors to allocate their assets between risky and risk-free assets, to test whether the monthly effect exists in the Chinese stock markets. The results show that March effect and March size effect are found in the Chinese markets, which findings are obviously different from the January effect and January size effect in the US and some developed markets. Consumption inertial hypothesis is used to explain the particular phenomena in the Chinese markets. Compared with previous findings, our empirical results in the Chinese markets also suggest that second-order SD with a risk-free asset (SSDR) for March effect replaces first- or second-order SD (FSD or SSD) for January effect in the US and some Asian markets, which result implies that allocating investor¡¯s assets between risky and risk-free assets can help distinguish the performance among the calendar months.

Suggested Citation

  • Chin-Shan Hsieh, 2016. "Revisiting the Monthly Effect for the Chinese Stock Markets," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 73-87, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:3:y:2016:i:2:p:73-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/aef/article/view/1271/1344
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/aef/article/view/1271
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Monthly Anomaly; Stochastic Dominance Theory; Efficient Set;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:3:y:2016:i:2:p:73-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.