IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/aefjnl/v3y2016i2p215-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Working Environment and Well-Being: Empirical Evidence from the 5th European Working Condition Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Lukas Schrott
  • Diana Moosbrugger
  • Anna Iwanowa

Abstract

The main aim of the paper is the definition of the constructs well-being, demands, resources and flexibility out of an existing and available data set. For this purpose we used the 5th European Working Conditions Survey, the theoretical assumptions from the Job Demands-Resources model (JD-R model) and further theoretical and empirical findings. Thus, we gained more information out of the data structure and the interdependence of the constructs, their dimensions and further explanatory variables as gender, work-life-balance, work-health-attitude, financial ease and type of contract. We also found interesting geographical pattern in the distribution of constructs. Hence, well-being is rather high in the northern part of West Europe and in North Europe. The resources, which affects well-being positive, are high in North Europe, while in South Europe they are low. Interestingly, also high demands with a negative influence on well-being, are found in the northern part of West Europe for the United Kingdom and Ireland. Flexibility is clearly high in North Europe and rather medium in the other countries. Thereby, overall flexibility is neutral concerning well-being, whereas the impact in the individual case can be positive as well as negative. Resources and demands are significant for employees well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukas Schrott & Diana Moosbrugger & Anna Iwanowa, 2016. "Working Environment and Well-Being: Empirical Evidence from the 5th European Working Condition Survey," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 215-242, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:3:y:2016:i:2:p:215-242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/aef/article/view/1429/1448
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/aef/article/view/1429
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    well-being; resources; demands; flexibility; labor; human resources; working conditions; European Union;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:3:y:2016:i:2:p:215-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.