IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/aefjnl/v12y2025i4p98-110.html

Diversification and the Efficient Market Hypothesis in Investments

Author

Listed:
  • Letícia Aparecida de Oliveira
  • Bernardo Malatesta Barros
  • Rafael Faria de Abreu Campos
  • Fabrício de Assis Campos Vieira

Abstract

The growth in the number of individual investors in B3, rising from 700,000 to 6.2 million between 2018 and 2022, has increased the demand for knowledge about effective financial strategies. In this context, diversification, a key concept in financial theory, stands out as a fundamental strategy for mitigating risks and ensuring more stable returns. This study examines the impact of diversification and the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) on equity investments in Brazil using data from "Google Finance". Random portfolios were constructed and evaluated over different time horizons (2, 5, and 10 years), comparing them to the Ibovespa and Ifix indices. The results indicate that increasing the number of assets in a portfolio reduces risk without compromising expected returns, demonstrating the effectiveness of diversification in optimizing the risk-return trade-off. This finding suggests that investors who choose not to diversify their portfolios are exposed to non-compensated market risks, reinforcing the importance of diversification as a strategy to maximize return potential while minimizing associated risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Letícia Aparecida de Oliveira & Bernardo Malatesta Barros & Rafael Faria de Abreu Campos & Fabrício de Assis Campos Vieira, 2025. "Diversification and the Efficient Market Hypothesis in Investments," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 12(4), pages 98-110, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:12:y:2025:i:4:p:98-110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/aef/article/download/7639/7098
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/aef/article/view/7639
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:12:y:2025:i:4:p:98-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.