IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v12y2023i7p657-663.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A stylo-rhetoric critique of rhetorical questions in N.G. Sibiya’s selected essays in Amalangabi

Author

Listed:
  • Sizwe Dlamini

    (Department of African Languages, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa)

Abstract

This article deals with rhetorical questions as a literary device in N.G. Sibiya’s selected essays in Amalangabi (1993). Rhetorical questions are employed for different purposes in literature, and this discourse intends to discover the rhetorical purpose they serve in Sibiya’s essays specifically. The study is motivated by the discovery that, even though rhetorical questions are used artistically in N.G. Sibiya’s essays, there seems to be no work, so far, that has been done to examine this. Since the study observes the rhetoric or stylistic use of rhetorical questions, literary stylistics is adopted as a theory to theoretically ground the analysis. Textual analysis, as a qualitative research technique, is also adopted because data is primary collected, organised, and interpreted from Sibiya’s two essays (Amalimi and Izibongo). The analysis of data will highlight how Sibiya employs rhetorical questions for different stylistic effects in his essays. This includes their emphasis and persuasive effects. It also includes their role as a channel to express strong emotions, their ability to draw readers to the problem and promote critical discussions, and their ability to challenge common assumptions and beliefs. Key Words:Rhetorical question, stylistics, essay, literary device

Suggested Citation

  • Sizwe Dlamini, 2023. "A stylo-rhetoric critique of rhetorical questions in N.G. Sibiya’s selected essays in Amalangabi," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 12(7), pages 657-663, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:657-663
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i7.2806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/2806/2035
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i7.2806
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i7.2806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:12:y:2023:i:7:p:657-663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.