What Does Flexicurity Have to Gain from the Capability-Approach?
The policy discourse termed flexicurity is on its way of becoming a concept. Yet, this political process bears the risk of departing from the very idea of flexicurity. This paper argues that this could be prevented if flexicurity were guided by a clear conception of human well-being. The paper suggests complementing flexicurity by the capability-approach. Random or adverse effects of flexicurity-policy on human freedom can be avoided if “flexibility and security” in the employment system are recognised not as ends in themselves, but as instruments at the service of people’s capabilities. In principle, it is argued, flexicurity has the potential of extending human freedoms.
Volume (Year): 23 (2012)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.hampp-verlag.de/|
|Order Information:|| Postal: Rainer Hampp Verlag, Journals, Vorderer Lech 35, 86150 Augsburg, Germany. A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available at|
Web: http://www.hampp-verlag.de/Hampp_Recherche_e.htm Email:
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rai:mamere:1861-9908_mrev_2012_2_lehwess-litzmann. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rainer Hampp)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.