IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Issues Concerning The Use Of Social And Environmental Indicators For Performance Management

Listed author(s):
  • Marian TAICU


    (Faculty of Economics and Law, University of Pitesti, Romania)

  • Maria Daniela BONDOC


    (Faculty of Economics and Law, University of Pitesti, Romania)

Registered author(s):

    The sustainable development of any economic entity and the economy as a whole is subject to managing overall performance. Appropriate performance management requires the use of specific tools that can give managers the information they need for decision making. Using the classic indicators of performance assessment must be supplemented by indicators that reflect value creation, and the performance obtained in the social and environmental fields. Social and environmental indicators are designed to provide an insight in the results of these areas that are so sensitive today. The paper aims to show how social and environmental indicators can be integrated into overall performance management.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by University of Pitesti in its journal Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences.

    Volume (Year): 15 (2016)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 115-122

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2016:i:3:p:115-122
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Michael Mitchell, 2012. "Can triple bottom line reporting become a cycle for “double loop” learning and radical change?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 25(6), pages 1048-1068, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2016:i:3:p:115-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Logica Banica)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.