IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Limites des méthodes d'évaluation et pertinence du concept de déficit public structurel

Listed author(s):
  • Carine Bouthevillain
  • Sophie Garcia
Registered author(s):

    [eng] In Europe the institutions and the functioning of labour markets vary greatly from one country to one other. Moreover, many empirical studies emphasised the heterogeneity of national labour demand and wage behaviours. However, the macroeconomic impact of these differences still has to be analysed. In this paper we offer such an evaluation. To this end we have built a small model based on recent estimations. We show that national wage and labour behaviours are not distinct enough to lead to national reactions that are strongly asymmetric in face of a common shock and to complicate the monetary policy in the EMU. In the meantime, in all the countries considered here, labour markets are characterised by a limited flexibility, in particular a low sensitivity of wages to the disequilibrium on the labour market. The EMU may of course change economic behaviours or bring about reforms, but it seems not reasonable to expect an increase in the labour market flexibility that would be strong enough to make up for the loss of stabilisation policy autonomy by countries of the Euro area.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Revue française d'économie.

    Volume (Year): 15 (2000)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 75-121

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_2000_num_15_1_1443
    Note: DOI:10.3406/rfeco.2000.1443
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_2000_num_15_1_1443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.