IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_2000_num_142_1_5992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dépenses de santé : l'hypothèse d'aléa moral

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre-Yves Geoffard

Abstract

[eng] Health Expenditures : the Moral Hazard Assumption by Pierre- Yves Geoffard . The analysis of many proposals to reform the French health insurance system, and in particular those focusing on co-payment schemes, is heavily dependent on delicate empirical measures of the elasticity of demand for health care. . This paper offers a critical survey of the empirical literature on the moral hazard assumption, according to which . more extensive health insurance coverage would lead to more spending. . The paper begins by recalling that the Rand Health Insurance Study, a major study conducted in the United States in . the 1970s, unambiguously concluded that the price elasticity of demand for medical care was negative, especially . for ambulatory care. The paper then stresses the limitations of more recent studies undertaken on French data - . limitations which are either inherent to the data or due to the econometric methods employed. In addition, . evaluating the redistributive aspects of co-payments and their impact on access to care would require more accurate . measures of cross price-income elasticity. . Despite all these uncertainties, the lessons drawn from the existing empirical studies suggest that the current French . co-payment scheme (the ticket modérateur system) is very far from being fair and efficient. [fre] L'analyse de nombreuses propositions de réforme du système d'assurance maladie, notamment celles visant à modifier le ticket modérateur, repose fortement, in fine, sur de délicates mesures empiriques des élasticités des fonctions de demande de soins. . Cet article propose un panorama critique de la littérature empirique, récente ou plus ancienne, consacrée à l'hypothèse d'aléa moral, selon laquelle une couverture maladie plus complète conduirait à davantage de dépenses. Après avoir rappelé que la grande étude de la RAND, réalisée aux États-Unis dans les années 70, avait conclu sans ambiguïté à une élasticité prix négative de la demande de soins, notamment ambulatoires, l'article insiste sur les limites des études réalisées sur données françaises, limites liées tant aux données disponibles qu'aux méthodes économétriques employées. En outre, afin d'examiner les effets redistributifs du ticket modérateur, ainsi que son impact sur l'accès aux soins, des mesures d'élasticité croisée prix revenu seraient nécessaires. Malgré toutes ces incertitudes et ces réserves, les leçons tirées des analyses empiriques laissent croire que le dispositif actuel de ticket modérateur est très éloigné d'un mécanisme juste et efficace.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre-Yves Geoffard, 2000. "Dépenses de santé : l'hypothèse d'aléa moral," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 142(1), pages 123-135.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2000_num_142_1_5992
    DOI: 10.3406/ecop.2000.5992
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.2000.5992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.2000.5992
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_2000_num_142_1_5992
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roquebert, Q. & Tenand, M., 2016. "Pay less, consume more? Estimating the price elasticity of demand for home care services of the disabled elderly," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 16/16, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2000_num_142_1_5992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.