IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prf/journl/v19y2025i1p73-100.html

Czech Participation in Ukraine’s Reconstruction: Risks, Scenarios and Opportunities in the Housing Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Miroslav Pavlák

    (University of Finance and Administration)

  • Roman Mentlík

    (University of Finance and Administration)

  • Miroslav Halouzka

    (University of Finance and Administration)

  • Svetlana Yurchenko

    (V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University)

Abstract

Background. The post-conflict reconstruction of Ukraine, especially in the housing and construction sector, has become a strategic priority for the European Union and its member states. Despite declared support, the real participation of Central European businesses, including those from the Czech Republic, remains limited due to multiple legal, security and financial barriers. Aim. The paper aims to identify the conditions, instruments and risks influencing the potential engagement of Czech enterprises in the reconstruction of Ukraine's housing and construction sector after 2022, with emphasis on investment frameworks, scenario modelling, and institutional capacities. Methods. The study combines a qualitative case study (cooperation between the University of Finance and Administration and V. N. Karazin University in Kharkiv), stakeholder analysis based on coded interviews with Czech entrepreneurs, and quantitative investment scenario modelling (2024–2033). Data triangulation was applied to ensure internal validity. Results. Findings confirm that while institutional and financial instruments (e.g., Ukraine Facility) are in place, their uptake is limited by high perceived risk and a lack of implementation facilitators. Investment scenarios range from 65 to 95 billion USD depending on security and absorption conditions. Czech SMEs face specific constraints such as insufficient legal safeguards and capacity limits yet remain strategically positioned to benefit from targeted support schemes. Recommendations. Policy actors should prioritise the development of national coordination platforms, risk insurance schemes (e.g., via EGAP), and pilot cooperation models with Ukrainian institutions. Stronger links between academia, public sector and private firms are essential to de-risk market entry and build long-term resilience. Practical relevance/social implications. The research provides applicable insights for government agencies, export organisations and business associations aiming to support Czech firms in entering high-risk post-conflict markets. Moreover, it demonstrates the role of academic institutions as platforms for international capacity building and post-war recovery. Originality/value. This is the first study focusing on the Czech context of post-war investment in Ukraine, combining scenario modelling with a grounded case study. The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods provides a comprehensive Framework for further research and policy development.

Suggested Citation

  • Miroslav Pavlák & Roman Mentlík & Miroslav Halouzka & Svetlana Yurchenko, 2025. "Czech Participation in Ukraine’s Reconstruction: Risks, Scenarios and Opportunities in the Housing Sector," ACTA VSFS, University of Finance and Administration, vol. 19(1), pages 73-100.
    • Handle: RePEc:prf:journl:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:73-100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://acta.vsfs.eu/pdf/acta-2025-1-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. Gregory Mankiw & Ricardo Reis, 2002. "Sticky Information versus Sticky Prices: A Proposal to Replace the New Keynesian Phillips Curve," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(4), pages 1295-1328.
    2. Lucas, Robert Jr., 1972. "Expectations and the neutrality of money," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 103-124, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olivier Coibion & Yuriy Gorodnichenko & Saten Kumar, 2018. "How Do Firms Form Their Expectations? New Survey Evidence," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(9), pages 2671-2713, September.
    2. Sergeyev, Dmitriy & Iovino, Luigi, 2018. "Central Bank Balance Sheet Policies Without Rational Expectations," CEPR Discussion Papers 13100, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Atahan Afsar; José Elías Gallegos; Richard Jaimes; Edgar Silgado Gómez & Jos� El�as Gallegos & Richard Jaimes & Edgar Silgado G�mez, 2020. "Reconciling Empirics and Theory: The Behavioral Hybrid New Keynesian Model," Vniversitas Económica, Universidad Javeriana - Bogotá, vol. 0(0), pages 1-41.
    4. Kevin Lansing, 2009. "Time Varying U.S. Inflation Dynamics and the New Keynesian Phillips Curve," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 12(2), pages 304-326, April.
    5. Alexander Mayer & Davide Raggi, 2025. "Estimation and inference in models with multiple behavioural equilibria," Papers 2512.04541, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    6. Alejandro Rodríguez Arana, 2014. "The relationship between the variance of inflation and the variance of output under different types of monetary policy," Working Papers 0814, Universidad Iberoamericana, Department of Economics.
    7. Candian, Giacomo, 2019. "Information frictions and real exchange rate dynamics," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 189-205.
    8. Adama Zerbo, 2018. "Essai d'une nouvelle représentation macroéconomique du marché du travail," Documents de travail 178, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
    9. Zhao Han & Xiaohan Ma & Ruoyun Mao, 2023. "The Role of Dispersed Information in Inflation and Inflation Expectations," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 48, pages 72-106, April.
    10. Keith Sill, 2014. "Forecast disagreement in the Survey of Professional Forecasters," Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, issue Q2, pages 15-24.
    11. Oleksiy Kryvtsov, 2005. "Information Flows and Aggregate Persistence," Computing in Economics and Finance 2005 416, Society for Computational Economics.
    12. Buiter, Willem H., 2006. "The elusive welfare economics of price stability as a monetary policy objective: why New Keynesian central bankers should validate core inflation," Working Paper Series 609, European Central Bank.
    13. Kurz, Mordecai & Jin, Hehui & Motolese, Maurizio, 2005. "The role of expectations in economic fluctuations and the efficacy of monetary policy," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 2017-2065, November.
    14. Sushant Acharya, 2017. "Costly Information, Planning Complementarities, and the Phillips Curve," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(4), pages 823-850, June.
    15. George-Marios Angeletos & Jennifer La’O, 2020. "Optimal Monetary Policy with Informational Frictions," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(3), pages 1027-1064.
    16. Rondina, Giacomo & Walker, Todd B., 2021. "Confounding dynamics," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    17. Peter N. Ireland, 2017. "Allan Meltzer’s Model of the Transmission Mechanism and Its Implications for Today," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 938, Boston College Department of Economics.
    18. Pierre Fortin, 2003. "Keynes resurrected," Cahiers de recherche du Département des sciences économiques, UQAM 20-21, Université du Québec à Montréal, Département des sciences économiques.
    19. Marianna Riggi & Alex Tagliabracci, 2022. "Price rigidities, input costs, and inflation expectations: understanding firms’ pricing decisions from micro data," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 733, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    20. Gilberto Tadeu Lima & Jaylson Jair Silveira, 2015. "Monetary Neutrality Under Evolutionary Dominance Of Bounded Rationality," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 53(2), pages 1108-1131, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R31 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location - - - Housing Supply and Markets
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • F35 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Aid
    • H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prf:journl:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:73-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Magdalena Šebková (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vsfspcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.