IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/procee/v7y2019p77-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative approach to smart features of higher education institutions: Uni Konstanz and UAIC Iasi

Author

Listed:
  • Bianca-Iuliana MISINCIUC

    (Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of IaÅŸi, Romania Department of Foreign Languages)

Abstract

Objectives: This paper is an analysis of higher education institutions in relation to the smart city concept. On a micro level, the features of a smart university coincide with those of a smart city. The paper aims to investigate the University of Konstanz, Germany and the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania from the perspective of their functioning, administration and network of resources in order to observe smart features and room for improvement. Approach: The investigation employs a comparative approach and uses observation and personal first-hand experience as a former student of both institutions as research methods. Results: This comparative study provides an overview on smart features, ideas and solutions that are implemented in different aspects of university life: campus geography, student accommodation, public transportation, online administration of the institution, online platforms and portals for students and teachers, recreational activities and fruitful interaction between students. The analysis points out smart elements and characteristics, such as integrated student accommodation and other facilities inside the campus, the existence of public transportation means designated for students, smart stations, bicycle rental services, internet-based registration for classes and exams, online application for study programs and other events, interactive spare time activities and student associations. Implications: This study may provide valuable material for researchers in the field of development and smart innovation and also ideas for practitioners that work in academic institutions or city administration. Value: The originality and uniqueness of the paper reside in the comparison between two academic institutions from different countries and also in the contribution to the promoting and expansion of the smart city concept. By bringing the concept to a lower level, smart features can be implemented in companies, academic institutions and even in people s homes. Studying similarities and contrast between smart features of different universities is essential in order to highlight possibilities for improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Bianca-Iuliana MISINCIUC, 2019. "A comparative approach to smart features of higher education institutions: Uni Konstanz and UAIC Iasi," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, vol. 7, pages 77-86, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:7:y:2019:p:77-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/303/267
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/303
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert G. Hollands, 2008. "Will the real smart city please stand up?," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 303-320, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tuba Bakıcı & Esteve Almirall & Jonathan Wareham, 2013. "A Smart City Initiative: the Case of Barcelona," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 4(2), pages 135-148, June.
    2. Andrew Clarke & Lynda Cheshire, 2018. "The post-political state? The role of administrative reform in managing tensions between urban growth and liveability in Brisbane, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(16), pages 3545-3562, December.
    3. Paola Panuccio, 2019. "Smart Planning: From City to Territorial System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq & Alavaiola Faumatu & Maha Hussein & Muhammad Laiq Ur Rahman Shahid & Nitin Muttil, 2020. "Smart City-Ranking of Major Australian Cities to Achieve a Smarter Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Sabina Baraniewicz-Kotasińska, 2022. "The Scandinavian Third Way as a Proposal for Sustainable Smart City Development—A Case Study of Aarhus City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, 2016. "City-as-a-Platform: The Rise of Participatory Innovation Platforms in Finnish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-31, September.
    7. Anthony McLean & Harriet Bulkeley & Mike Crang, 2016. "Negotiating the urban smart grid: Socio-technical experimentation in the city of Austin," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(15), pages 3246-3263, November.
    8. Quitzow, Leslie & Rohde, Friederike, 2022. "Imagining the smart city through smart grids? Urban energy futures between technological experimentation and the imagined low-carbon city," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 341-359.
    9. Eleftheria KOLOKYTHA & Georgios KOLOKYTHAS & Stavros VALSAMIDIS & Giannoula FLOROU, 2015. "The Contribution Of The Open Data To The Development Of The Smart Cities," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 14(2), pages 3-16.
    10. De Santis, Roberta & Fasano, Alessandra & Mignolli, Nadia & Villa, Anna, 2014. "Smart city: fact and fiction," MPRA Paper 54536, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Łukasz Brzeziński & Magdalena Krystyna Wyrwicka, 2022. "Fundamental Directions of the Development of the Smart Cities Concept and Solutions in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-52, November.
    12. Kristian Hoelscher, 2016. "The evolution of the smart cities agenda in India," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 19(1), pages 28-44, March.
    13. Jin-Kyu Jung & Jung Eun Kang, 2023. "Smart Engagement and Smart Urbanism: Integrating “The Smart” Into Participatory Planning and Community Engagement," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 1-5.
    14. Leonardo Juan Ramirez Lopez & Angela Ivette Grijalba Castro, 2020. "Sustainability and Resilience in Smart City Planning: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    15. Enrico di Bella & Matteo Corsi & Lucia Leporatti, 2015. "A Multi-indicator Approach for Smart Security Policy Making," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 653-675, July.
    16. Kamila Borsekova & Katarina Petrikova & Anna Vanova, 2015. "Building of smart cities in specific conditions of transitional economies," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1030, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Gornik, Markus, 2020. "Smart governance: Kashiwa-no-ha smart city in Japan as a model for future urban development?," Wuppertaler Studienarbeiten zur nachhaltigen Entwicklung, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, volume 22, number 22.
    18. Inese Mavlutova & Dzintra Atstaja & Janis Grasis & Jekaterina Kuzmina & Inga Uvarova & Dagnija Roga, 2023. "Urban Transportation Concept and Sustainable Urban Mobility in Smart Cities: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Witold Chmielarz & Marek Zborowski & Alicja Fandrejewska & Mesut Atasever, 2021. "The Contribution of Socio-Cultural Aspects of Smartphone Applications to Smart City Creation. Poland–Turkey Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    20. Dillip Kumar Das, 2019. "Exploring Perspectives of the Information Technology Industry in a South African City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-34, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    smart university; smart campus; transportation solutions; online administration; comparative analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:7:y:2019:p:77-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.