IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/journl/v4y2020i1p37-55.html

Recommendations, best practices and key factors of smart city and smart citizenship

Author

Listed:
  • Katalin FEHER

    (Budapest Business School University of Applied Sciences)

  • Boros ISTVÁN

    (Hungarian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Objectives The goal of the paper is to present an overview of current and future-oriented smart city concepts with particular consideration of smart citizenship. Prior work The evolution of the academic references is considered regarding the subject area. Approach Based on a systematically filtered governmental, business and university research corpus, a global insight is synthesised. Results Applying text network analysis, key factors and best practices of smart cities were mapped. The resulted summary provides the future smart city developments and the smartification of citizenship. Beyond, the analysis has explored unexpected essential metaphors from rainforest to backbone providing a specific overview of smart city and smart citizens. Implications The resulted recommendations support the relevant strategy of the future city managements, and also, the upcoming and comprehensive academic analysis. Value The highlighted trends and metaphors contribute to the holistic view of smart city and smart citizenship by specific recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Katalin FEHER & Boros ISTVÁN, 2020. "Recommendations, best practices and key factors of smart city and smart citizenship," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 4(1), pages 37-55, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:pop:journl:v:4:y:2020:i:1:p:37-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://scrd.eu/index.php/scrd/article/view/62/55
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://scrd.eu/index.php/scrd/article/view/62
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vito Albino & Umberto Berardi & Rosa Maria Dangelico, 2015. "Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 3-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dejan Križaj & Miha Bratec & Peter Kopić & Tadej Rogelja, 2021. "A Technology-Based Innovation Adoption and Implementation Analysis of European Smart Tourism Projects: Towards a Smart Actionable Classification Model (SACM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olga Bogdanov & Veljko Jeremiæ & Sandra Jednak & Mladen Èudanov, 2019. "Scrutinizing the Smart City Index: a multivariate statistical approach," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 37(2), pages 777-799.
    2. Roblek Vasja & Meško Maja & Podbregar Iztok, 2021. "Mapping of the Emergence of Society 5.0: A Bibliometric Analysis," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 54(4), pages 293-305, December.
    3. Yan, Jianghui & Liu, Jinping & Tseng, Fang-Mei, 2020. "An evaluation system based on the self-organizing system framework of smart cities: A case study of smart transportation systems in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    4. Junjie Liu & Xiaomeng Liu & Jiaoping Yang, 2024. "TOE Configuration Analysis of Smart City Construction in China Under the Concept of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Jovani Taveira de Souza & Antonio Carlos de Francisco & Cassiano Moro Piekarski & Guilherme Francisco do Prado, 2019. "Data Mining and Machine Learning to Promote Smart Cities: A Systematic Review from 2000 to 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Reynoso Vanderhorst, Hamlet & Heesom, David & Yenneti, Komali, 2024. "Technological advancements and the vision of a meta smart twin city," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Carmen Cantuarias-Villessuzanne & Romain Weigel & Jeffrey Blain, 2021. "Clustering of European Smart Cities to Understand the Cities’ Sustainability Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Becker, Jörg & Distel, Bettina & Grundmann, Matthias & Hupperich, Thomas & Kersting, Norbert & Löschel, Andreas & Parreira do Amaral, Marcelo & Scholta, Hendrik, 2021. "Challenges and potentials of digitalisation for small and mid-sized towns: Proposition of a transdisciplinary research agenda," ERCIS Working Papers 36, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    9. Mariusz J. Ligarski & Tomasz Owczarek, 2024. "Preparing Quality of Life Surveys Versus Using Information for Sustainable Development: The Example of Polish Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 765-782, July.
    10. Vu, Khuong & Hartley, Kris, 2018. "Promoting smart cities in developing countries: Policy insights from Vietnam," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 845-859.
    11. Maria Vincenza Ciasullo & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi & Daniele Leone, 2020. "Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1167-1195, December.
    12. Dana Indra Sensuse & Shidiq Al Hakim, 2019. "Building Smart Knowledge Mapping Conceptual Model," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Pira, Milad, 2025. "Anti-disciplinary research on how to investigate poverty using the smart city concept," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    14. Anthony Simonofski & Estefanía Serral Asensio & Johannes Smedt & Monique Snoeck, 2019. "Hearing the Voice of Citizens in Smart City Design: The CitiVoice Framework," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(6), pages 665-678, December.
    15. Ezra Ho, 2017. "Smart subjects for a Smart Nation? Governing (smart)mentalities in Singapore," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(13), pages 3101-3118, October.
    16. Michael Yit Lin Chew & Evelyn Ai Lin Teo & Kwok Wei Shah & Vishal Kumar & Ghassan Fahem Hussein, 2020. "Evaluating the Roadmap of 5G Technology Implementation for Smart Building and Facilities Management in Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-26, December.
    17. Martin David & Florian Koch, 2019. "“Smart Is Not Smart Enough!” Anticipating Critical Raw Material Use in Smart City Concepts: The Example of Smart Grids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-11, August.
    18. Milo Costanza-van den Belt & Tayanah O’Donnell & Robert Webb & Eleanor Robson & Robert Costanza & Jiaqian Ling & Sarah Crowe & Hao Han, 2021. "Community Preferences for Urban Systems Transformation in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, April.
    19. Mauro ROMANELLI, 2021. "Rediscovering urban intelligence within cities by technologies," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 5(3), pages 115-122, July.
    20. Wojciech Kozlowski & Kacper Suwar, 2021. "Smart City: Definitions, Dimensions, and Initiatives," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 509-520.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:journl:v:4:y:2020:i:1:p:37-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.