IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/journl/v10y2026i2p21-33.html

Tech-led urban transition and citizen participation in civic governance: Case study from an Indian city

Author

Listed:
  • Deepak KUMAR

    (Dr, Asian Development Research Institute, Patna, India)

Abstract

Globally, citizen-centric development has been widely advocated for a just, smart and sustainable transition of urban centers amid the rising urbanization and cities emerging as engines of growth. Against the tech-centric approach, effective citizen participation in urban local governance and development has been stated as the key to reaching that goal. However, scholarly work on urban governance and citizen participation has highlighted the institutional bottlenecks hindering active citizenry. Echoing similar concerns on urban governance, this paper examines the challenges of citizen-centric governance in case of the Indian city of Patna under the national urban scheme of Smart Cities Mission. Launched in 2015, the mission has marked a decade of implementation of ‘smart’ projects in selected 100 cities for urban transformation ensuring quality living to residents through smart solutions. Relying on primary data collected through an online survey, the paper finds lack of awareness among the respondents about the city-level governance structure, reflecting a disconnect between city government and citizens. A moderate positive correlation has been found between awareness about municipal wards and citizens lodging civic complaints. Furthermore, a negligible impact has been found with respect to citizens relying on social media and tech-based apps to engage in urban governance and accessing civic services. This paper contributes to the literature on urban governance and citizenship emphasizing on increased civic awareness about institutions of urban governance for active citizen participation beyond tech-led apparatus.

Suggested Citation

  • Deepak KUMAR, 2026. "Tech-led urban transition and citizen participation in civic governance: Case study from an Indian city," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 10(2), pages 21-33, april.
    • Handle: RePEc:pop:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:2:p:21-33
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25019/40b0ab14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scrd/article/view/798/867
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scrd/article/view/798
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.25019/40b0ab14?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taylor Shelton & Thomas Lodato, 2019. "Actually existing smart citizens," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 35-52, January.
    2. David Sweeting & Jessica de Alba-Ulloa & Mario Pansera & Alex Marsh, 2022. "Easier said than done? Involving citizens in the smart city," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(6), pages 1365-1381, September.
    3. Dorien Zandbergen & Justus Uitermark, 2020. "In search of the Smart Citizen: Republican and cybernetic citizenship in the smart city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(8), pages 1733-1748, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Battulga Buyannemekh & Mila Gasco-Hernandez & J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, 2024. "Fostering Smart Citizens: The Role of Public Libraries in Smart City Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Dietmar Offenhuber, 2019. "The platform and the bricoleur—Improvisation and smart city initiatives in Indonesia," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(8), pages 1565-1580, October.
    3. Ozge CELIK YILMAZ & Ozhan ERTEKIN, 2023. "Urban Living Labs As A Tool To Achieve Sustainable Development Goal 16: A Case Study Of Istanbul, Turkiye," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(3), pages 88-118, August.
    4. Alex Marsh & David Sweeting & Jesús Arturo Flores López & Jessica De Alba-Ulloa & Victoria Rivera-Ugarte, 2025. "Constructing the smart city beyond the state: Exploring the conditions for institutional change in Mexico City," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 43(7), pages 1447-1466, November.
    5. Paolo Cardullo & Rob Kitchin, 2019. "Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of ‘citizen-focused’ smart cities in Europe," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(5), pages 813-830, August.
    6. Butot, Vivien & Bayerl, Petra Saskia & Jacobs, Gabriele & de Haan, Freek, 2020. "Citizen repertoires of smart urban safety: Perspectives from Rotterdam, the Netherlands," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Deepak KUMAR, 2023. "The Making of Smart Citizenry Decoding Smart Citizen," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 7(2), pages 85-96, June.
    8. Pacheco, Jose Nicolas & Turro, Andreu & Urbano, David, 2025. "Open social innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Joachim Åström, 2020. "Participatory Urban Planning: What Would Make Planners Trust the Citizens?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 84-93.
    10. Katharina Lange & Jörg Knieling, 2020. "EU Smart City Lighthouse Projects between Top-Down Strategies and Local Legitimation: The Case of Hamburg," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 107-115.
    11. Desirée Enlund & Katherine Harrison, 2025. "The complexities of smartification: Exploring horizontal tensions in smart city governance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(10), pages 2029-2045, August.
    12. Gabriella Esposito & Alberto Bertello & Luca Mora & David Tucek, 2026. "How do boundary objects influence people-centered smart cities? A systematic literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 617-648, February.
    13. Raquel Pérez‐delHoyo & Higinio Mora & José Manuel Nolasco‐Vidal & Rubén Abad‐Ortiz & Rafael A. Mollá‐Sirvent, 2021. "Addressing new challenges in smart urban planning using Information and Communication Technologies," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 342-354, May.
    14. Norbert Lebrument & Cédrine Zumbo-Lebrument & Corinne Rochette, 2025. "Application of the VBN theory to understand residents’ participation in the smart city: The case of French metropolises," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(5), pages 954-975, April.
    15. Tooran Alizadeh & Deepti Prasad, 2024. "The right to the smart city in the Global South: A research agenda," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(3), pages 426-444, February.
    16. Hagit Keysar, 2025. "Digital displaceability in the settler-colonial city: The case of Musrara in western Jerusalem," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 43(8), pages 1525-1545, December.
    17. Joachim Åström, 2020. "Participatory Urban Planning: What Would Make Planners Trust the Citizens?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 84-93.
    18. Aisha Sobey, 2023. "Obliged smart freedom: The Singaporean experience of advanced neoliberal-developmental governance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(16), pages 3336-3352, December.
    19. Jooseok Oh & Minho Seo, 2021. "Measuring Citizens-Centric Smart City: Development and Validation of Ex-Post Evaluation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    20. Maria Rosaria Stufano Melone & Stefano Borgo & Domenico Camarda, 2025. "Digital Twins Facing the Complexity of the City: Some Critical Remarks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:2:p:21-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.