IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v46y2011p107-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harmonization. Comparative Approach Of The Romanian Fiscal Code And French General Tax Code

Author

Listed:
  • Anamari-Beatrice STEFAN

    (PhD, University "Petru Maior" of Tirgu-Mureº, Faculty of Economics, Law and Administrative Sciences,ROMANIA.)

Abstract

Even with all the current debates on the harmonization of corporate income taxes within the European Union, the EU countries continue to support their own national corporate income taxes. Still, the growing integration of economic activity is placing bigger and bigger pressures on this problem, as transnational companies are operating more and more across Europe.Debates argue pro and con on this problem, EU, Companies or member countries have different opinions and arguments. The target of this paper is to analyze from a comparative perspective the Romanian and French corporate tax system and to find pro and con arguments for harmonization from the perspective of advantages and disadvantages for countries and companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Anamari-Beatrice STEFAN, 2011. "Harmonization. Comparative Approach Of The Romanian Fiscal Code And French General Tax Code," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 46, pages 107-114, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:46:y:2011:p:107-114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj11/recjurid113_12F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate tax; taxable profit; harmonization; tax system;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K34 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Tax Law
    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:46:y:2011:p:107-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.