IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pstr00/0000176.html

Identifying intervention areas to shape healthier urban development in the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Geoff Bates
  • Daniel Black
  • Sarah Ayres
  • Krista Bondy
  • Neil Carhart
  • Judi Kidger

Abstract

The quality of urban environments is an important determinant of public and planetary health globally, yet often they do not provide the conditions for good health. Many of the causes of poor-quality environments are located far upstream in areas of policymaking, governance and control of the complex urban development system, involving a diverse range of stakeholders across multiple sectors, tiers of decision-making, and publics. There is a lack of clarity about the challenges involved, and where to prioritise actions to effectively transform the system towards healthier urban development. This article identifies multiple areas in the United Kingdom’s urban development systems where interventions can be targeted to shape the development of healthier and more sustainable urban environments. The study sets out the main findings from the first phase of a large-scale, five year research programme. It takes a systems-based approach to specify and prioritise the upstream problems that restrict healthy urban development. We focus on two key sectors of development that affect health outcomes through a variety of pathways: property development and transport planning. We identify 50 ‘intervention areas’, specifying the problems and where they can be tackled, and report areas prioritised for intervention. The intervention areas identified reveal three broad and mutually reinforcing themes: (i) a lack of prioritisation of health in urban agenda setting and subsequent policy making, (ii) deeper structural barriers, both national and international, and (iii) existing points for leveraging health that do not currently maximise health impacts. The findings contribute to the literature on creating healthy and sustainable urban environments, and extend debates on how health can be understood through systems-based approaches to upstream decision-making and wider structural and institutional forces. Practically, they provide potential areas of intervention for strategies towards improving the quality of urban environments, which are essential for safeguarding future human and planetary health.Author summary: Urban environments are an important influence on human health and environmental sustainability. Currently, many of these environments are not producing good health outcomes. Their development is shaped by many stakeholder groups and interacting factors. Some of these are, in theory, within our control (e.g., government policies), while others are largely outside (e.g., global forces). All these areas are typically outside of the scope of public health interventions, and there is a lack of clarity about what needs to change. We aimed to identify areas of critical decision-making in the United Kingdom’s urban development systems where interventions can be targeted to shape the development of healthier and more sustainable cities. We identify 50 ‘intervention areas’, specifying the problems and where they can be tackled, and report areas prioritised for intervention in a large-scale research project. The intervention areas were grouped into three broad themes: prioritising health in the policies that shape urban development, deeper structural barriers to healthy urban development, and opportunities within existing mechanisms for promoting health impacts. Our study provides new insights into strategies that are needed to improve the quality of urban environments, which are essential for safeguarding future human and planetary health.

Suggested Citation

  • Geoff Bates & Daniel Black & Sarah Ayres & Krista Bondy & Neil Carhart & Judi Kidger, 2025. "Identifying intervention areas to shape healthier urban development in the United Kingdom," PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pstr00:0000176
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/article?id=10.1371/journal.pstr.0000176
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pstr.0000176&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andy Pike & Peter O’Brien & Tom Strickland & Graham Thrower & John Tomaney, 2019. "Financialising City Statecraft and Infrastructure," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18319.
    2. Lasse Berntzen & Marius Rohde Johannessen, 2016. "The Role of Citizen Participation in Municipal Smart City Projects: Lessons Learned from Norway," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: J. Ramon Gil-Garcia & Theresa A. Pardo & Taewoo Nam (ed.), Smarter as the New Urban Agenda, edition 1, pages 299-314, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiago de Melo CARTAXO & Johana M. CASTILLA & Marcin DYMET & Kamrul HOSSAIN, 2021. "Digitalization and smartening sustainable city development: an investigation from the high north European cities," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 5(1), pages 83-101, February.
    2. Tuna Taşan-Kok & Sara Özogul, 2021. "Fragmented governance architectures underlying residential property production in Amsterdam," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1314-1330, September.
    3. Battulga Buyannemekh & Mila Gasco-Hernandez & J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, 2024. "Fostering Smart Citizens: The Role of Public Libraries in Smart City Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Anthony Simonofski & Estefanía Serral Asensio & Johannes Smedt & Monique Snoeck, 2019. "Hearing the Voice of Citizens in Smart City Design: The CitiVoice Framework," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(6), pages 665-678, December.
    5. Robert Huggins & Piers Thompson & Malcolm Beynon & David Pickernell & Paul Jones, 2025. "Levelling-up national economies through regional development? a panel fsQCA approach applied to Great Britain," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 74(1), pages 1-39, March.
    6. Phil McManus & Graham Haughton, 2021. "Fighting to undo a deal: Identifying and resisting the financialization of the WestConnex motorway, Sydney, Australia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 131-149, February.
    7. Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Seng Boon Lim & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Social Inclusion Indicators for Building Citizen-Centric Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, January.
    8. Sam Preston & Muhammad Usman Mazhar & Richard Bull, 2020. "Citizen Engagement for Co-Creating Low Carbon Smart Cities: Practical Lessons from Nottingham City Council in the UK," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Pauline McGuirk & Robyn Dowling & Pratichi Chatterjee, 2021. "Municipal Statecraft For The Smart City: Retooling The Smart Entrepreneurial City?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(7), pages 1730-1748, October.
    10. Hanna Hilbrandt & Monika Grubbauer, 2020. "Standards and SSOs in the contested widening and deepening of financial markets: The arrival of Green Municipal Bonds in Mexico City," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(7), pages 1415-1433, October.
    11. Michael Goldman, 2023. "Speculative urbanism and the urban-financial conjuncture: Interrogating the afterlives of the financial crisis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(2), pages 367-387, March.
    12. Stephanie Farmer & Rachel Weber, 2022. "EDUCATION REFORM AND FINANCIALIZATION: Making the Fiscal Crisis of the Schools," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 911-932, November.
    13. N/A, 2020. "Book symposium: Pike et al.’s Financialising City Statecraft and Infrastructure," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(4), pages 790-813, June.
    14. Zhenfa Li & Fulong Wu & Fangzhu Zhang, 2023. "State de-financialisation through incorporating local government bonds in the budgetary process in China," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(5), pages 1169-1190.
    15. Sepasgozar, Samad M.E. & Hawken, Scott & Sargolzaei, Sharifeh & Foroozanfa, Mona, 2019. "Implementing citizen centric technology in developing smart cities: A model for predicting the acceptance of urban technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 105-116.
    16. Grete Gansauer & Julia H Haggerty & Kristin K Smith & Mark N Haggerty & Kelli F Roemer, 2024. "Can infrastructure help ‘left behind’ places ‘catch up?’ Theorizing the role of built infrastructure in regional development," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 17(2), pages 393-406.
    17. Matthew Thompson & Vicky Nowak & Alan Southern & Jackie Davies & Peter Furmedge, 2020. "Re-grounding the city with Polanyi: From urban entrepreneurialism to entrepreneurial municipalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1171-1194, September.
    18. Laura Deruytter & David Bassens, 2021. "The Extended Local State under Financialized Capitalism: Institutional Bricolage and the Use of Intermunicipal Companies to Manage Financial Pressure," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 232-248, March.
    19. Mark Tewdwr-Jones & Alexander Wilson, 2022. "Co-Designing Urban Planning Engagement and Innovation: Using LEGO® to Facilitate Collaboration, Participation and Ideas," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 229-238.
    20. Fritz-Julius Grafe & Harald A. Mieg, 2021. "Precaution and Innovation in the Context of Wastewater Regulation: An Examination of Financial Innovation under UWWTD Disputes in London and Milan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-10, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pstr00:0000176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: sustaintransform (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.