IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/ppat00/1009313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diverging patterns of introgression from Schistosoma bovis across S. haematobium African lineages

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Rey
  • Eve Toulza
  • Cristian Chaparro
  • Jean-François Allienne
  • Julien Kincaid-Smith
  • Eglantine Mathieu-Begné
  • Fiona Allan
  • David Rollinson
  • Bonnie L Webster
  • Jérôme Boissier

Abstract

Hybridization is a fascinating evolutionary phenomenon that raises the question of how species maintain their integrity. Inter-species hybridization occurs between certain Schistosoma species that can cause important public health and veterinary issues. In particular hybrids between Schistosoma haematobium and S. bovis associated with humans and animals respectively are frequently identified in Africa. Recent genomic evidence indicates that some S. haematobium populations show signatures of genomic introgression from S. bovis. Here, we conducted a genomic comparative study and investigated the genomic relationships between S. haematobium, S. bovis and their hybrids using 19 isolates originating from a wide geographical range over Africa, including samples initially classified as S. haematobium (n = 11), S. bovis (n = 6) and S. haematobium x S. bovis hybrids (n = 2). Based on a whole genomic sequencing approach, we developed 56,181 SNPs that allowed a clear differentiation of S. bovis isolates from a genomic cluster including all S. haematobium isolates and a natural S. haematobium-bovis hybrid. All the isolates from the S. haematobium cluster except the isolate from Madagascar harbored signatures of genomic introgression from S. bovis. Isolates from Corsica, Mali and Egypt harbored the S. bovis-like Invadolysin gene, an introgressed tract that has been previously detected in some introgressed S. haematobium populations from Niger. Together our results highlight the fact that introgression from S. bovis is widespread across S. haematobium and that the observed introgression is unidirectional.Author summary: Hybridization is a fascinating evolutionary phenomenon that raises the question of how species maintain their integrity. Inter-species hybridization occurs between certain Schistosoma species that can cause important public health and veterinary issues. In particular hybrids between Schistosoma haematobium and S. bovis associated with humans and animals respectively are frequently identified in Africa. Recent genomic evidence indicates that some S. haematobium populations show signatures of genomic introgression from S. bovis. Here we conducted a comparative genomic study to assess the genomic diversity within S. haematobium and S. bovis species and genetic differentation at the genome scale between these two sister species over the African continent. We also investigated traces of possible ancient introgression from one species to another. We found that S. haematobium display low genetic diversity compared to S. bovis. We also found that most S. haematobium samples harbor signature of past introgression with S. bovis at some genomic positions. Our results strongly suggest that introgression occurred long time ago and that such introgression is unidirectional from S. bovis within S. haematobium. Such introgresssion event(s) result in diverging patterns of genomic introgression across S. haematobium lineages.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Rey & Eve Toulza & Cristian Chaparro & Jean-François Allienne & Julien Kincaid-Smith & Eglantine Mathieu-Begné & Fiona Allan & David Rollinson & Bonnie L Webster & Jérôme Boissier, 2021. "Diverging patterns of introgression from Schistosoma bovis across S. haematobium African lineages," PLOS Pathogens, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:ppat00:1009313
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1009313
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1009313&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009313?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:ppat00:1009313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plospathogens (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.